Talk:Antichthon
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
How can this article be improved?
[edit]This is a growing article. There are many ways it could be improved. For example:
- Adding further detail through research
- Adding sources
- Adding outside links
- Adding books or other media in which this or a similar astronomical object appears.
These are just a few ideas. Can anyone think of more? Mrwuggs 22:33, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Merger
[edit]- Suggestion:Counter-Earth merge with Antichthon
- Further discussions can be found at :Talk:Counter-Earth#Merger
- Support -- I realize now that a copy and paste merger is the wrong way to merge things, but seriously, there is no reason why this should be two pages. Although the copy/paste job was improperly done, that was just the way this article should look. This page seems ideal for a speedy merger. I mean, Antichthon means counter-Earth. There is no justification for having pop-culture ideas about the counter-earth in their own article. Mrwuggs 19:40, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose – Oppose your merger — your merger is wrong. Antichthon is the absolute wrong title to use for a merged counter-Earth article. Oppose merger to Counter-Earth — because this article is lengthy. 132.205.44.134 02:06, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- What? This article is a stub. It is not, by any stretch of the imagination, lengthy.
- Oppose. "Counter-earth" might have been distantly inspired by Pythagorean concepts, but it's considerably different from Antichthon. --Akhilleus (talk) 03:15, 29 September 2006 (UTC)