Talk:Anti-handling device

Military history: Technology / Weaponry Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Explosives Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Explosives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Explosives on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ExplosivesWikipedia:WikiProject ExplosivesTemplate:WikiProject ExplosivesExplosives
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Recent edits I reversed

I changed back this: An unexploded bomb may or may not detonate if it is lifted or overturned but, in contrast, an anti-tank mine with an anti-handling device fitted is absolutely guaranteed to detonate if it is lifted/overturned, because it is specifically designed to react in that way.

to this: An unexploded bomb may or may not detonate if it is lifted or overturned but, in contrast, an anti-tank mine with an anti-handling device fitted will detonate if it is lifted/overturned, because it is specifically designed to do so.

The use of the language "absolutely guaranteed" is verbose but, more importantly, is incorrect: Because some mines' anti-handling devices may fail, we cannot say that it is "absolutely guaranteed." (And, "guarantee" would be good enough with "absolutely," anyway.) To put it briefly: Don't be so verbose.

On "react in that way," again, it's needlessly verbose. We just explained what will happen, so "do so" is all that's needed.

Also, regarding the semi-colon/colon "undo" you did: Yes, the letter following a semi-colon is lower-case. You failed to notice that the edit you made was to a colon, not a semi-colon. Jeff Muscato (talk) 10:09, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested merge

Oppose - if anything, I suggest that Anti-handling device is merged into Booby trap, Based on page statistics alone:

Booby trap:

Watchers - 53
Page views - 12760

Anti-handling device:

Watchers - Less than 30
Page views - 1726

Based on page views, Booby trap is nearly 9 times as popular as anti-handling device.

Plus:

Booby trap is a more common term for the layman
Booby trap article is more developed than anti-handling deveice, which if anything is a bit over-technical and militaristic.

a_man_alone (talk) 11:20, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Changed the direction of the proposed merge. Socrates2008 (Talk) 11:48, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anti-handling device. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141101042558/http://64.78.11.86/uxofiles/gallery/BombFuzes/data/images1/m123.jpg to http://64.78.11.86/uxofiles/gallery/BombFuzes/data/images1/m123.jpg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:53, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]