Talk:Anti-competitive practices

Economics High‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business High‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Price discrimination is not anti-competititve

I'm removing the section on price discrimination, because it is demonstrably not anti-competitive - in that it does not and cannot reduce competition in a space. Here's a source to that effect: https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/facsch_lawrev/1134 Fresheneesz (talk) 19:47, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of sources

This article currently is not properly sourced but it is formatted much like a list, and the items on this page are often sourced as anti-competitive practices. This is a useful article. Blue Rasberry (talk) 01:48, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anti-competitive practices. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20031224114200/http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/ites/0299/ijee/klein.htm to http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/ites/0299/ijee/klein.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Second half of this article completely lacks citations

From about the 3rd paragraph of "Effects" right down to the end of the article, there are no citations. The last two sections in particular, (Section 4 "Anti-competitive practices in different market systems" and Section 5 "The effectiveness of Anti-competitive practices in national stabilization") contain highly dubious statements with nothing to back them up. ENSOsurfer (talk) 14:34, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gobbledygook Banderswipe (talk) 06:14, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gobbledygook. Some sentences are incoherent and incomprehensible. Examples: “A chain of monopolists under can cause prices …”; “… to disadvantage [presumably meaning “to harm”] competing firms and consumers”; “Based on the research from Long in 2018, it observed that, the Anti-competitive is not only an industry regulation behavior, but also a modern industry characteristics for stakeholders to compete in within an fair market system.” Banderswipe (talk) 06:17, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non-compete clauses

This article does not mention non-compete clauses. Are these clauses usually anti-competitive? Jarble (talk) 21:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]