Talk:Anti-Tom literature

A fact from Anti-Tom literature appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 August 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in response to the 1852 publication of Uncle Tom's Cabin, writers in the Southern United States produced a body of anti-Tom literature which attempted to show that slavery was not evil?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2005/August.

Wikipedia

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The article calls Uncle Tom's Cabin "the best-selling novel of the 19th century". Is this meant to be worldwide or was Uncle Tom's Cabin just the best-selling American novel? I can't find a similar claim in the Uncle Tom's Cabin; what's the source for this? Thanks for clearing this up.--Pharos 01:37, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It was the best selling novel in the world in the 19th century. This information is stated in numerous locations, including the second reference at the bottom of the article: "Caroline Lee Hentz's Long Journey" by Philip D. Beidler. Alabama Heritage Number 75, Winter 2005. Here is the section that states this: "In 1850 Nathaniel Hawthorne kicked off a decade of saleable domestic melodrama with the controversial Scarlet Letter. The book was quickly eclipsed only a year later, however, by Susan Warner's The Wide, Wide World. (It is frequently forgotten that, with the exception of Harriet Stowe's Uncle Tom's Cabin, Warner's book was the best-selling American novel of the nineteenth century.)"

Okay, technically, that reference is to the American domestic audience. However, there are others, such as [1] and [2]. The second reference says, "It was to become the second best-selling book in the world during the nineteenth century, second only to the Bible." Thanks for pointing out that this info wasn't in the Uncle Tom's Cabin article. I have now added it.--Alabamaboy 01:53, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for confirming that; it's a pretty striking aspect of the book's history that I'm surprised wasn't in its article before.--Pharos 02:17, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Why do people claim that slaves were African Americans? President Abraham Lincoln asked Congress for money to pay slaveowners "for the loss of their property." Slaves were captives. Slaves were a commodity. Slaves were bought and sold. Please cease corrupting history. 141.151.176.221 00:43, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Two points. One, it seems to me that "without literary merit" is POV, I've tweaked it a bit. Also, I would believe that some slave narratives were a response to anti-Tom novels, but it seems to me that the genre actually predates anti-Tom writing, so I don't see how the whole genre can be described as a response. Is there some citation for this? Ethan Mitchell 23:54, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Needs references

I noticed a while back that this article doesn't have the linked references system its supposed to have. I could copy the system from another article but I don't have the references to add in. Someone should do this.--Onewayday 18:58, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Uncle Tom's Cabin?

All of the content in this article is quoted from Uncle Tom's Cabin. Is this a good candidate for merging? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.172.40.129 08:28, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, that section of Uncle Tom's Cabin is quote from this article and the UTC article only contains a fraction of the info here. No need to merge.--Alabamaboy 15:25, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CouldGone With the Wind be considered anti-Tom literature?

I know that it was published in the wrong period , but it references Uncle Tom's Cabin through Northerners asking about slave-owners treatment of slaves based on their reading of the book, portrays African-Americans as childlike and dependent on white people, and is generally sympathetic to the pre-Civil War South and slavery. Curtangel 17:21, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. This type of literature was written directly in response to UTC. GWTW wasn't written as a direct response to that novel. Best, --Alabamaboy 19:59, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the Southern Literary Response section, I feel it would be more descriptive and less biased to write that Anti-Tom literature perpetuated a paternalistic viewpoint of the relationship between slaves and masters instead of describing it as simply "racist." Thanks, Scott

Done. This change was already made in the main Uncle Tom's Cabin article and should have also been made here. Best, --Alabamaboy 18:36, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anti-Tom literature. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050609074741/http://docsouth.unc.edu:80/hentz/menu.html to http://docsouth.unc.edu/hentz/menu.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:27, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A British Anti-Tom novel

Could With Lee in Virginia published in 1890 be regarded as an Anti-Tom novel? By G. A. Henty a prolific Victorian English author of adventure books for boys. It probably reflects the sympathy in Britain for the South during the American Civil War though. Hugo999 (talk) 11:00, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The origin of the label "Anti-tom literature"

I was looking for material about how fiction was used to support slavery, in opposition and reaction to Uncle Tom's Cabin. This article is very helpful. I am wondering about the title of the article itself. When and by who is the origin of the phrase "anti-Tom" literature. I have found a reference as far back as 1966, an article in which the phrase is used 10 times, but I doubt this is the original source.

Dowty, Alan. "Urban Slavery in Pro-Southern Fiction of the 1850's." The Journal of Southern History (1966): 25-41.

I find it frustrating that the title of the article cannot be documented in history. Hoping others can contribute their resources to answer this. Pete unseth (talk) 21:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]