Talk:Anti-Slavery Society (1823–1838)

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

British Empire Low‑importance

	British Empire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

File:The Anti-Slavery Society Convention, 1840 by Benjamin Robert Haydon.jpg to appear as POTD soon

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:The Anti-Slavery Society Convention, 1840 by Benjamin Robert Haydon.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on November 29, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-11-29. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! —howcheng {chat} 18:35, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the day

Benjamin Haydon's painting of Thomas Clarkson addressing the 1840 Anti-Slavery Convention, held by the Anti-Slavery Society at Exeter Hall in London. The organisation was the second to bear that name and was dedicated to the abolishment of slavery worldwide. It continues to function today as Anti-Slavery International.Painting by Benjamin Haydon

Archive – More featured pictures...

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anti-Slavery Society. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100626074739/http://www.antislavery.org/english/what_we_do/antislavery_international_today/frequently_asked_questions.aspx to http://www.antislavery.org/english/what_we_do/antislavery_international_today/frequently_asked_questions.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:35, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Name confusion

I've suggested moving this page, after doing a cleanup to focus this page on the earlier society. Before my cleanup, there was overlap and confusion between the two societies. I did initially wonder if they could both be covered in the same article, but the one started in 1939 appears to be a separate entity, and the current body, Anti-Slavery International, gives its foundation date as 1939. (Both articles need more work and citations, but I wanted to get the history and naming accurate as it was affecting work I have been doing on other articles.) I'll add a bit more when I have time. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:39, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 3 December 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Anti-Slavery Society (1823–1838) (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 20:05, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Slavery Society → Society for the Mitigation and Gradual Abolition of Slavery Throughout the British Dominions – Confusion between two organisations commonly referred to as the Anti-Slavery Society, with many articles linking to this article when they should be linking to the later society (post-1839 - now Anti-Slavery International). The links in the other articles would have to checked and manually re-linked to the correct organisation after the move, and the Anti-Slavery Society could be a DAB page.) If the suggested new name is too long, it could be London Anti-Slavery Society, which was actually its name during its last year of existence. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:31, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support either, the current name is not WP:PRECISE; recommend a dab page at "Anti-Slavery Society" (t · c) buidhe 16:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Society for the Mitigation and Gradual Abolition of Slavery Throughout the British Dominions is perhaps a bit wordy but definitely an improvement, and as a former official name should definitely be there as a redirect at least. I have no better suggestion. London Anti-Slavery Society also seems acceptable, and should also be a redirect, but I prefer the longer and definitely unambiguous name. Anti-Slavery Society should be a DAB for now. Andrewa (talk) 06:48, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:OFFICIAL. What about Anti-Slavery Society (1823)? Vpab15 (talk) 18:37, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, yes I see your point. But maybe Anti-Slavery Society (1823–1838), to make it clearer? Laterthanyouthink (talk) 00:04, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that would work too. Vpab15 (talk) 11:00, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I do agree that the long name is a bit long. (Hence putting it out for discussion rather than just moving the page myself.) Laterthanyouthink (talk) 00:04, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would suggest adding the dates since (a) it would make clear which anti-slavery society and (b) tell people the date range (it can get confusing which anti-slavery society when). I guess we should check the timeline and also whether "Anti-Slavery Society" was the commonly used name.

Society for Effecting the Abolition of the Slave Trade (1787-1823?) replaced by
Society for the Mitigation and Gradual Abolition of Slavery Throughout the British Dominions (1823-1838) (this article) wound down and a new org created
British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society (1838-1909) (it and the rest are in one article) which merged with another organization to become
Anti-Slavery and Aborigines' Protection Society (1909-1947) name changed to
Anti-Slavery Society (1947-1956) name changed to
Anti-Slavery Society for the Protection of Human Rights (1956-1990) name changed to
Anti-Slavery International for the Protection of Human Rights (1990-1995) name changed to
Anti-Slavery International (1995-present)

I also did a search of "anti-slavery society" and of the full name in Hansard for the years in question. Nothing turned up for the latter but quite a number for the former (though some but not all referred to city or county anti-slavery groups). I would say the common name was extremely common. --Erp (talk) 05:21, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vote? Thanks to all for your input. Does anyone object to Anti-Slavery Society (1823–1838) (with redirects from the others) then? buidhe, Andrewa, Vpab15, Erp? Laterthanyouthink (talk) 03:27, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I do not. (t · c) buidhe 03:42, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support this alternate proposal. Ticks all the boxes IMO. Andrewa (talk) 15:20, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Slavery Society (1823–1838) works for me too. Vpab15 (talk) 14:08, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.