Jump to content

Talk:Anti-Japanese sentiment in Korea

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Anti-Japanese sentiment in Korea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:02, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Anti-Japanese sentiment in Korea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:22, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Anti-Japanese sentiment in Korea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:18, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

contemporary issues section

[edit]

why is it important to mention that Yuji Hosaka is "non-Korean race Japanese-born"? Their race/country of origin is not really relevant to their beliefs. @Mureungdowon Tdmurlock (talk) 04:42, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As a foreigner with Japanese nationality, he lived in South Korea for a long time and acquired South Korean nationality. Even though he was Japanese. Therefore, Yuji Hosaka would not have said such a thing if racism against the Japanese was rampant in South Korea. There is really no racial discrimination against the Japanese in South Korea. Chinese are slightly discriminated against in South Korea, but not severely, and Vietnamese are mainly discriminated against in South Korea. Mureungdowon (talk) 04:57, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like asserting "There is really no racial discrimination against the Japanese in South Korea." based on a quote by one guy is a textbook case of WP:UNDUE. Tdmurlock (talk) 05:04, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why I have added NPOV tag

[edit]

One of the main editors on this page, @Mureungdowon, has expressed strong nationalist views around South Korea and has admitted they have a negative view of Japanese people. Moreover, they have expressed that they believe "There is really no racial discrimination against the Japanese in South Korea".

See also, the NPOV discussion here. Cheers. Tdmurlock (talk) 05:29, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is really no racism against the Japanese in South Korea. Should I bring the link that the South Korean feminist and leftist Twitician said? Of course, what I said now could be POV. However, I have never edited any POV in the article 'Anti-Jeanese sentiment in Korea'. If I hadn't created the user page, you wouldn't have been able to attack me unfairly. Mureungdowon (talk) 05:42, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is clear discrimination to conclude that the user is editing POV just because he has a specific ideology. For example, a socialist edited an article related to criticism of socialism into NPOV and you attacked the edit as POV. Change socialism to Korean nationalism here. I didn't put any bias in the article and I didn't reflect my ideology. Mureungdowon (talk) 05:44, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Let me be a little straightforward. Tdmurlock Your behavior would rather be liked by South Korean anti-feminists. Because you don't say it's a POV when I edit against South Korea. You should study the diplomatic perspective of those who attack feminism in South Korea and Japan. I have rather done far more editing related to South Korea's inappropriate anti-Japanese sentiment than editing related to Japan's inappropriate anti-Japanese sentiment. Now logically explain which part of this article is POV. Mureungdowon (talk) 05:50, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The vast majority of your edits to this page have been fairly blatant whataboutisms it seems are specifically intended to distract the reader from the point of the article (which, if I have to remind you, is Anti-Japanese sentiment in Korea) by either A. downplaying it or B. inserting irrelevant things Japan has done to make such anti-Japanese prejudice seem justified. Tdmurlock (talk) 06:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unification Church

[edit]

South Korea's anti-Japanese sentiment and Japan's anti-Korean sentiment are complicated in many ways. In South Korea, 'Unification Church' is known as a pro-Japanese religion. Shinzo Abe has been accused of promoting anti-Korean racism in Japan, especially when liberals came to power in the South Korea, supporting a very tough and nationalist foreign policy. At the same time, Shinzo Abe is deeply attached to Unification Church, a cult religion in South Korea. Thus, there may be more anti-Korean sentiment in issues involving Unification Church by liberals and socialists than by far-right anti-Korean ultra-nationalists/racists in Japan. On the contrary, some leftists in the South accuse UC of being a pro-Japanese far-right.

I don't know how to explain this easily to readers in the article. In general, "anti-Korean" in Japan is associated with right-wing politics, and "anti-Japanese" in South Korea is associated with liberal politics. However, the Unification Church controversy triggered by the assassination of Shinzo Abe is a completely different variable that has not been seen so far. Mureungdowon (talk) 06:37, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]