Talk:Anti-Chinese sentiment in the United States

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anti-Chinese sentiment in the United States article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

United States: Asian Americans High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Asian Americans (assessed as High-importance).

Discrimination High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Politics: American High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

International relations High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.

Copied Sinophobia (oldid, history) → Anti-Chinese sentiment in the United States (diff)
Copied Chinese Exclusion Act (oldid, history) → Anti-Chinese sentiment in the United States (diff)
Copied Yellow Peril (oldid, history) → Anti-Chinese sentiment in the United States (diff)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Anti-Chinese sentiment in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110928124208/http://today.caltech.edu/today/story-display.tcl?story_id=39604 to http://today.caltech.edu/today/story-display.tcl?story_id=39604

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:45, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Anti-Chinese sentiment in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:33, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Anti-Chinese sentiment in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=revelation%2016%3A12-16%3A12&version=50
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071013201844/http://boas.wordpress.com/2006/08/19/nyus-archivist-of-the-yellow-peril-exhibit/ to http://boas.wordpress.com/2006/08/19/nyus-archivist-of-the-yellow-peril-exhibit/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://culberson.house.gov/bolden-in-beijing/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:55, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

US Campaign Attack Ads Take Aim at China.ogv

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 23:51, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Editorializing sentence

I removed what I think is a bad sentence from the article but got reverted, so I suppose we go to the talk page. This sentence

"Despite their playfulness, use of such terms mockingly implies the virus (which is not a flu) is China's aggressive gift to the world, and distracts from the fact that thousands of Chinese have suffered and died from the virus, particularly in Wuhan, thereby belittling the widespread suffering of Chinese under pandemic conditions."

is very unencyclopedic, sounding much more like a reflection on the subject rather than a statement of facts. It's sourced to an opinion piece by Amanda Marcotte, who is primarily a provocateur and not an objective commentator. (For those who doubt this, non-provocateurs don't write books titled "Troll Nation: How the Right Became Trump-Worshipping Monsters Set on Rat-F*cking Liberals, America, and Truth Itself".) A statement like this should not be given in Wikipedia's voice--it should either be removed or properly attributed to Marcotte herself.

Also the Fox News link is a 404, meaning the part about where the terms come from is currently unsourced. 173.29.96.94 (talk) 17:28, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the sentence and replaced it with a hopefully more encyclopedic description of the controversy. We'll see whether it stands this time. This is my first time editing much more than a typo on Wikipedia, so I'm not sure it's any good, but it's definitely an improvement over what was there before.

Toanoopie (talk) 14:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Washington State Senate Democrat Leadership"

I understand someone took this edit war to ANEW already? User:Firestar464 made this last revert, removing that content, and I agree: the content is grossly undue (this one-time allegation pertaining to one state takes up 10% of an article that is about the entire history of racism in the US). Moreover, the sourcing is wholly inadequate--the sources are either primary or an editorial from a newsletter. There is no way that this should ever be in this article. Drmies (talk) 21:07, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not a single mention of Taiwan

Taiwan and the US generally hold positive views of each other:

https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2020/05/12/in-taiwan-views-of-mainland-china-mostly-negative/ https://www.thechicagocouncil.org/sites/default/files/2021-08/2021%20Taiwan%20Brief.pdf

I understand that nationality and ethnicity have varying overlap globally (heterogeneous societies like the US are an anomaly), but this is an important caveat that needs to be added to the article, because both countries (ROC and PROC) are overwhelmingly Han Chinese, and so anti-Chinese sentiment today can't be congruent with that of pre-Mao China. The US has a sizeable Chinese-American population, and so the ethnic prism becomes even cloudier. All Chinese people are Chinese, and not all Chinese people are Chinese. Something like that. Basic set theory. 2600:1012:B066:CF5C:1883:5375:5500:C179 (talk) 03:56, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added something. 2600:1012:B066:CF5C:1883:5375:5500:C179 (talk) 04:35, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]