Talk:Antheraea polyphemus
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Rarity
[edit]How rare exactly is this moth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.227.229 (talk) 00:52, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Antheraea polyphemus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040216045625/http://www3.islandtelecom.com:80/~oehlkew/zpolmoth.htm to http://www3.islandtelecom.com/~oehlkew/zpolmoth.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
Distribution and Habitat Section
[edit]Hello Wikipedians.
I thought it would be apt to recommend that a distribution and habitat section would be very helpful. It would allow readers to understand the habitat of the species and where they can be found in the world. Additionally, a distribution map of the species can be included to be a visual aid for viewers. It will also help answer the comment above regarding how sparse or rare these moths really are. This information can also be evolutionarily important as it provides information about the species' environmental niche. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vkrishnan2 (talk • contribs) 02:23, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Conservation Section
[edit]I believe that the title, Conservation is not appropriate for a section talking about other organisms that hunt or parasitize this moth. Instead this section should be named Predation and Parasitism and another section could be titled Conservation if there is indeed endangerment in this population.Sahilmehta97 (talk) 00:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
"Response to threats" section
[edit]The "Response to threats" section contains a large amount of trash and a small amount of good material. It seems as though every second word in there has been converted into a link to something obvious, some of the section is duplicate information from the rest of this article, and a great deal of the section is off-topic; lessons on frogs, lessons in general biology, and so on. I knew if I started cutting, with the mood I'm in, the section would end up with only four words. So I'll leave it to someone with more brains. TooManyFingers (talk) 06:56, 1 March 2024 (UTC)