Talk:Antarctica during World War II

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article was accepted from this draft on 22 May 2021 by reviewer Buidhe (talk · contribs).

Antarctica Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Antarctica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Antarctica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AntarcticaWikipedia:WikiProject AntarcticaTemplate:WikiProject AntarcticaAntarctica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European / German / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Science Low‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Requested move 22 May 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 03:18, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Antarctica in World War II → Antarctica during World War II – No warfare took place in Antarctica, so "during" would be a more accurate descriptive title. The article describes several activities by various countries, none of which included hostile or warlike acts. The current title implies that Antarctica was in some way involved in the war. See WP:TITLE. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:38, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support. While "in" doesn't necessarily imply involvement, its common use to describe an involvement is more likely to parse in that manner, where "during" is neutral and works fine.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:17, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The word In makes it seem like Antarctica was a country involved in the fighting as opposed to the locations of various expeditions. I just created this from a redlink at requested articles so I did not make the title. I think during would make much more sense. Gandalf the Groovy (talk) 14:29, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination, Fuhghettaboutit and Gandalf the Groovy. "During" is certainly more intuitive than "in". —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 02:58, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Per WP:PRECISE. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 13:21, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.