Talk:Ansonia latidisca

A news item involving Ansonia latidisca was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 15 July 2011.

Wikipedia

Amphibians and Reptiles Mid‑importance

	Ansonia latidisca is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

photo

photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.234.132.113 (talk) 00:18, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a photo on this article. AJona1992 (talk) 00:23, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Someone please upload a photo, with proper permissions. StevePrutz (talk) 16:05, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's impossible at the moment. But if we can find out what the source of the old sketch is, if not Inger 1966, we could perhaps use it. FunkMonk (talk) 22:30, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK says you can't use an ITN item if it was the featured item at ITN

... which this one wasn't. So I nominated it at DYK: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Did_you_know#Articles_created.2Fexpanded_on_July_14

I suggested author credit for Sharktopus, Steveprutz, Scientific29, and Cmglee. If you feel you made a major contribution to this article and I missed you, my apologies -- please go to the DYK nomination and add yourself. $Sharktopus$ ^talk 16:43, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dohhh, I was mistaken. Being "featured" at ITN does not require being the top item with a picture, it just means having the article linked in bold, which a version of this one was, no matter how briefly. Well, anybody who feels like working on a slightly less sexy DYK, as in Timema stick bugs that didn't have sex for a million years (BBC had a story on them), you're very welcome to come play with that one instead.

Sharktopus

^talk 00:15, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Only known from drawings?

Several specimens are mentioned in the original decription: http://www.archive.org/stream/systematicszooge52inge#page/108/mode/2up See also here: http://oxford.academia.edu/LeticiaOchoaOchoa/Papers/969906/Planning_Amphibian_Conservation_in_Mexico FunkMonk (talk) 22:14, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]