Jump to content

Talk:Ansgar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Birth

[edit]
  • "Anskar was born in 801. The date September 8th sometimes given as his birthday was the date of the translation of his body to the church of St. Peter, at Bremen ; cf. Leben des heiligen Ansgar, by Dreves, p. 250. The actual date of his birth is unknown.
    Nothing is known for certain concerning the birthplace of Anskar, or the social position of his parents. Le Cointe (Annal Eccles. Francor. viii., p. 115) conjectures that his father was a man of some standing in the court of Charlemagne. In the time of Mabillon there was a street called after Anskar, in Foliet, a suburb of Corbey, and it has been suggested that this represents a tradition that he was born here.
    " (Robinson 1921)
  • "Ansgar ist geboren im Jahre 801. Tag, Monat und Geburtsort kennt man nicht. Über seine Herkunft weiß man fast nichts." (Wilhelm Schamoni, Rimberts Leben des heiligen Ansgar 1965)

-- Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:56, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Patrimony

[edit]

Ansgar is not the patron of Denmark. It is Canute the Holy/Canute the IV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edlef (talkcontribs) 09:41, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ansgar and the slave trade

[edit]

according with "The rise of the medieval world, 500-1300: a biographical dictionary" by professor Jana K. Schulman Ansgar[1] "was responsible for Christianizing the people of northern Europe and working to eliminate the Viking slave trade."[2]--Domics (talk) 09:02, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Saint or not?

[edit]

I'm a bit unclear about Wikipedia policy regarding "saint". Blaise is "Saint Blaise" but Ansgar is not. They are roughly equal in importance. Can anyone clear this up for me?--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 21:44, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ansgar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:09, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

more work needed

[edit]

While outside a library, I cleaned up the article, intending only to transform a couple of in-line references into footnotes. However, it appears many of the passive constructions came from a near plagiarization from the New Schaaf-Herzog Encyclopedia improperly cited. Someone with access to all the references probably should look over the article as well as my changes.Jweaver28 (talk) 18:05, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]