Talk:Anonymous (Tomahawk album)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: WesleyDodds (talk · contribs) 14:57, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

O hai Mike Patton record. I'll review this in a day or two. It's rather spartan; that's not necessarily a detriment, though at first glance I wonder if there could be more about the production of the record and the music itself. WesleyDodds (talk) 14:57, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Review

1. Well-written:

"Anonymous charted in several countries, recording positions in Australia, Norway and the United States". Do you mean it was recorded in Australia, Norway, and the United States?

No, just that it reached chart positions in those countries; I guess "recorded" was an ambiguous word to use. Changed it now. GRAPPLE X 19:14, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2. Verifiable with no original research:

I'm concerned that all the information regarding the making of the album is sourced from reviews. Reviews are opinion pieces, not reportage.

While they're opinion pieces, I've only used reviews from sources with good editorial oversight, so I was confident that uncontroversial facts would be alright from them (Pitchfork and PopMatters, for example, are sites whose non-review articles I'd love to be able to use for exactly the same info, but unfortunately this one flew pretty much under the radar). GRAPPLE X 19:14, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Still try your hardest to replace the reviews with interview sources for the same material.

I've tried several times now to comprehensively comb Google (including Google Books) and Highbeam, and even after waiting a while for any post-Oddfellows interviews to make mention of the album, I'm still coming up with nothing that's not already there. Patton and Denison never really were media darlings and it's times like this that's a shame. :( GRAPPLE X 20:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replace the iTunes link with a secondary source. I would think a site like Pitchfork would announce single releases

Pitchfork don't have it anywhere (they do mention the next single, "Stone Letter", but that's from a different album). The Ipecac Recordings website makes no mention of it either. GRAPPLE X 19:14, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Lymangrover is specifically writing for Allmusic, not AllRovi.

Fair enough, changed. GRAPPLE X 19:14, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No chart information shows up when I click the Billboard link.

Bugger, Billboard have completely overhauled their site and it's now a pain in the ass to navigate. Have tracked it down on the new site but I might end up trying something like the wayback machine to find the page I had original used, as it's a lot cleaner. GRAPPLE X 19:14, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

3. Broad in its coverage:

I'm concerned that there's next to nothing on what the album sounds like. I understand that an album like this won't have as much factual information available on its music as, say, Loveless (album), but using some Google-fu, I was able to turn up this interview where Duane Denison explains that he and Mike Patton shared bass guitar duties on the album. I feel much more research can be done to bulk up the article if even just a little bit.

Fantastic find, though in fairness I missed that one as it came out after this was written (there seems to be a few incidental mentions of the album in reviews/news for Oddfellows, the new record, but mostly in the vein of "first album since 2007's Anonymous", which makes me cry a little every time I find it in a search). I've been scouring the web for information on basically any of the band's albums but most of them are near impossible to find anything substantial for. GRAPPLE X 19:14, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

4. Neutral:

No issues

5. Stable:

No issues

6. Images:

There's a tag on the album cover page saying a smaller version of the image needs to be uploaded.

Ah, neglected to check that. Have uploaded a smaller one now and appended a request for deletion of the old revision. GRAPPLE X 19:14, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Other notes:

Simple list formatting is recommended for simple tracklists like the one found in this article, per the album style guidelines.

Looking at that, it just specifies a "numbered list", not necessarily one generated by simple hashes. My understanding of the style guide was that a plain hash-generated numbered list is the minimum requirement, but I suppose I could format a template-free one if this is a major point. GRAPPLE X 19:14, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Putting on hold for about a week so these issues can be resolved. I'll be checking back regularly on your progress. WesleyDodds (talk) 10:59, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to review this. I'm working on integrating that new interview into it now (will also be useful for the Oddfellows (album) article so thanks twice). GRAPPLE X 19:15, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stalled?

It's been a month since anything has been posted to this page, and no article edits have been made in almost that long. What's left to be done on this review? BlueMoonset (talk) 02:53, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]