Talk:Anomalous operation

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anomalous operation redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Please read before starting

Wikipedia policy notes for new editors:
A common objection made by new arrivals is that the article presents parapsychology in an unsympathetic light and that criticism of it is too extensive or violates Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View (WP:NPOV) policy. The sections of the policy that apply directly to this article are:

Also of particular relevance are:

In short, there are certain topics and fringe viewpoints we should not be giving false balance to. See Fringe theories (WP:FRINGE) for more context on how Wikipedia deals with fringe views.

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 January 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Merge with Parapsychology?

Yes, go for it! jxm (talk) 14:47, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well maybe, but merging shouldn't mean deletion by redirection. The parapsychology article does not define the term anomalous operation. Wbm1058 (talk) 22:47, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on the Fringe theories/Noticeboard

See Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard/Archive 37#Anomalous operation. Wbm1058 (talk) 22:50, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]