Talk:Anomali

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tags

To expand upon the reasons I have placed multiple cleanup tags on the page, the article reads like an advertisement, is lacking citations in areas that reflect language oriented towards those who are technically oriented, and some of the sources in the article look like self-published blogs focused on cybersecurity, and one of the citations is literally a Microsoft-hosted blog page. The lead contains buzzwords/buzzphrases (open source threat intelligence) that don't seem to be supported by references to RS in the text of the article. Overall, this needs an overhaul. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:11, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined.

I am an Anomali employee, and therefore have a COI. I am wondering why this article is flagged? In looking at other vendor entries, I don't see how this is commercial. Can we work together to get it inline? Looks factually accurate to me. JWF+Anomali (talk) 02:05, 7 August 2021 (UTC) Please provide reliable source and explain the change that you wants to be in the article.[reply]

Not done: You need to explain the changes you are wishing to propose. Quetstar (talk) 04:17, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not requesting an edit per se. I am not requesting any change. I am asking why this is flagged with:

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This article may need to be rewritten to comply with Wikipedia's quality standards. (June 2021) The lead section of this article may need to be rewritten. (June 2021) This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. (June 2021) This article needs additional citations for verification. (June 2021) Some of this article's listed sources may not be reliable. (June 2021)

I am trying to understand how it is commercial? It is similar to many other cybersecurity vendor pages out there. Can anyone advise on what needs to be done to have the flag removed? As an employee with a COI, clearly I am not the person to do it. It is in the interest of the cybersecurity to see the entry aligned with Wikipedia guidelines. JWF+Anomali (talk) 23:40, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]