Talk:Anne Locke

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Christianity: Reformed Christianity Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Reformed Christianity portal This article is supported by WikiProject Reformed Christianity (assessed as Mid-importance).

Women writers High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poetry

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sonnet clarifications?

Wyatt

Currently, the article states:

"Both Locke and Wyatt composed one sonnet per line of the psalm, except for verses 1 and 4, which are each glossed with two poems."

This seems wrong on a couple of levels: 1) Wyatt's versification of Psalm 51 (Miserere mei domine, "Rue on me lord...") is in terza rima (27 tercets plus concluding line), not sonnets; according to Harrier (the edition I have to hand) these are disposed thus: Verse 1 = 9 lines, V2=6, V3=3, V4=11, V5=6, V6=8, V7=4, V8=4, V9=2, V10=2, V11=2, V12=2, V13=3, V14=1, V15=6, V16=5, V17=3, V18=3, V19=3 (as you see, they don't match up evenly with tercets). So it is certainly true that Wyatt's versifications of lines 1 and 4 are -- like Locke's -- his longest. But unless I'm very confused, the current description is not right.

NB: it turns out that 1 & 4 are the longest verses of Psalm 51, so their extended treatment is "by the book". In fact in some translations these Psalm verses are actually represented by 2 pairs of parallel lines, as opposed to the other verses which are represented by 1 pair, or 1 triplet (though I'm a little fuzzy on just what texts Wyatt & Locke might have had in front of them). Phil wink (talk) 04:43, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Surrey

Is there a reason that the discussion of how Locke settled on her rime scheme seems to disregard Tottel's Miscellany? While she could not have brought it with her to Geneva (it was published in England just after she arrived), I see no reason she couldn't have gotten a hold of a copy between 1557 and 1560. There are several representatives of her rime scheme on its first dozen or so pages. Phil wink (talk) 23:57, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anne Locke. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091105072910/http://www.kateemersonhistoricals.com:80/TudorWomen8.htm to http://www.kateemersonhistoricals.com/TudorWomen8.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]