This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
I disagree with removing the following: "Irregular handling of incoming emails from soldiers opposed to proposed merger of special forces: In 2013 nine emails from tillitsvalgte (soldiers elected to represent their cohorts) of Marinejegerkommandoen were not logged into the record of incoming mail at the ministry of defence.[1] On 10 June 2013 she was criticised by then leader of parliament's Committee on Scrutiny and Constitutional Affairs for events that happened in her area of responsibility: "It is disgusting to see that emails in an uncomfortable matter are being held away from the log of incoming mail" [at the ministry of defence].[2] On 11 June 2013 the Committee on Scrutiny and Constitutional Affairs sent her six questions about her handling of the emails.[3] On 12 June 2013 media said that she still had not answered (the media) if the emails had been deleted at some point.[3] A 12 June 2013 editorial in Verdens Gang said that the emails "evidently were recovered from the trash pail on the minister's phone, tablet computer or computer".[4] On June 17 her latest set of answers to the committee, were published.[5] The latest set of answers quotes her saying "There is no connection between record keeping lacking, and that the senders of the emails were critical to the process surrounding the chief of defence'sfagmilitære advice."[6]
On 10 June 2013 NRK said that the minister has been "strongly criticized for not having taken seriously allegations in regards to lies, manipulation and threats of phone tapping by the highest echelons of Norway's military, related to the proposal of moving Marinejegerkommandoen from Ramsund and Bergen to Rena".[7] (On 5 June 2013 Bergens Tidende said that Karl Egil Hanevik, chief of Norwegian Special Operation Command[8] has been accused of threatening soldiers in regards to future wire tapping of their phone conversations.[9])"
^ ab"Nekter å svare på om e-poster ble slettet". Tidligere i går sendte kontrollkomiteen på Stortinget selv seks spørsmål til forsvarsministeren om hennes oppsiktsvekkende håndtering av de ni e-postene.Cite error: The named reference "Nektersvar" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
^Verdens Gang. 2013-06-12. Nå kommer denne, og en rad andre e-poster frem. Alle sammen tydeligvis fra en eller annen søppelbøtte på statsrådens telefon, nettbrett eller datamaskin.{{cite news}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
I agree that a mention of this case seems warranted. However, it's important to avoid undue weight; a Biography of a Living Person must be balanced at all times. "Given their potential impact on biography subjects' lives, biographies must be fair to their subjects at all times." Since the article is fairly short, there shouldn't be more than a brief mention of the case. Alternatively there must be a general expansion of the article covering several sides of her career, which would give room for more coverage also of the e-mail case. Regards, Iselilja (talk) 10:42, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
