Talk:Annals of Improbable Research

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Magazines Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Science Mid‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Why was the information about the AIR website removed/reverted? (28 Nov. 2005).

It's still there. But I did mistakenly remove the link to the blog, which I have returned - shame on me, it's a great daily dose of humor. Links to directories that list the site are unnecessary, though. - DavidWBrooks 19:08, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, one of AIR's claims to fame is that it's the most popular science/humor site on the net - directory links notwithstanding. That paragraph was also removed. Some mention should probably also be made of mini-AIR, the e-newsletter.

How to Build an Atom Bomb

The fake information on how to build a nuclear weapon was in JIR, not AIR. Google the phrase "the device basically works". 204.97.106.125 22:41, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Based on a helpdesk request by User:StarryEye, I've had a look into the paragraph:

AIR received attention from American military intelligence when a copy of one of their articles was found among other papers in an abandoned terrorist headquarters in the Middle East. The article was a highly unrealistic and farcical explanation of how to build a nuclear weapon that some unwitting Al Qaida member had filed away. Nonetheless the discovery prompted a short-lived official investigation of AIR.

Both of the references referred to the Journal of Irreproducible Results. One, the Village Voice ref, mentions "It's a reprint of a scientific parody called "How to Build an Atom Bomb," from the geek-humor newsletter Annals of Improbable Research, originally known as the Journal of Irreproducible Results.". So that one covers both JIR and AIR. However, if I understand things correctly, AIR is not JIR. Thus the Village Voice mistaken there. Anyway, I've looked up some other refs (NYT, The Scotsman, and others) and all blamed the article on JIR. Given that, and given my love for overly long explanations, I've moved the paragraph. :) - Bilby (talk) 02:54, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

improb.com

The website now doesn't look at all like the archived 2009 site; it's full of what look like sponsored product advertorial. MrDemeanour (talk) 15:51, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You mean improbable.com? It's not advertorial; it's full of articles from the magazine and a few relates things like Marc's co-authored book on Bark Beetles. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 18:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - I see you were looking at "improb.com". That's not the website linked in the article. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 18:58, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Under References, reference #3 links to improb.com, with the link-title "Improbable Research". MrDemeanour (talk) 15:15, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It links to an archived page back when improb.com was still good; it doesn't link to the website itself. I have updated the website in the infobox- DavidWBrooks (talk) 16:35, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]