Talk:Anna Sorokin/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Aussie Article Writer (talk · contribs) 07:01, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | I did some very minor copyedits, however the prose is quite clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct. | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
| |
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | There is a book out about this, but I don't see any citations to it except the one I added. I am putting this as a question, but I would think to be complete it might be worthwhile ensuring this got some coverage.
| |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
| |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | No images in article, this does not prevent it from being a Good Article.
| |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | No images in article, this does not prevent it from being a Good Article. | |
7. Overall assessment. |
Discussion
[edit]This will not affect the article, but shouldn't we have a decent photo of Sorokin? even one under fair use? Just a general question, with no baring on the GA status of this article. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 09:11, 17 July 2021 (UTC)- Just discovered WP:MUG. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 13:15, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- Firefly I see you have done a few changes already, thanks! Sorry this took so long to review, I am trying to navigate a very confusing bureaucracy called the NSW government relating to lockdown health orders (long story) so I am reviewing whilst waiting for someone to pick up the phone. Anyway, I actually think this is an excellent article, and with some changes it will easily become GA. Ping me when you have done the changes so I can review. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 10:51, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Aussie Article Writer: I'm glad you liked the article, and thank you for the review. Various tweaks (mostly citation related) made, have a look and see what you think. firefly ( t · c ) 13:08, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Firefly: I gotta get some sleep (it's 11:12pm here in Sydney, and I have to get to a vaccination appointment tomorrow!), I will try to look tomorrow. Thanks for working on this article, I remember hearing about it ages ago and always wondered what happened! Now I know. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 13:12, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- Aussie Article Writer, no problem at all on both counts! :) firefly ( t · c ) 13:15, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Firefly: very close now! Just one last query in the citations criteria… let me know if what I’m suggesting is reasonable. And no, I can’t get to sleep. Sigh. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 16:40, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Aussie Article Writer: Done! (Hope you can sleep soon!) firefly ( t · c ) 17:04, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Firefly: well done, this passes GAN! I added some images for colour. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 17:10, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- Aussie Article Writer - thanks! :) firefly ( t · c ) 17:13, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- Firefly I strongly suggest submitting to DYK. Fascinating article, and so, so many great hooks. A shoe in for DYKN if ever I saw one. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 17:18, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- Aussie Article Writer - thanks! :) firefly ( t · c ) 17:13, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Firefly: well done, this passes GAN! I added some images for colour. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 17:10, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Aussie Article Writer: Done! (Hope you can sleep soon!) firefly ( t · c ) 17:04, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Firefly: very close now! Just one last query in the citations criteria… let me know if what I’m suggesting is reasonable. And no, I can’t get to sleep. Sigh. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 16:40, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- Aussie Article Writer, no problem at all on both counts! :) firefly ( t · c ) 13:15, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Firefly: I gotta get some sleep (it's 11:12pm here in Sydney, and I have to get to a vaccination appointment tomorrow!), I will try to look tomorrow. Thanks for working on this article, I remember hearing about it ages ago and always wondered what happened! Now I know. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 13:12, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Aussie Article Writer: I'm glad you liked the article, and thank you for the review. Various tweaks (mostly citation related) made, have a look and see what you think. firefly ( t · c ) 13:08, 17 July 2021 (UTC)