Talk:Anna Devane

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 May 2022. The result of the discussion was redirect.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Soap Operas

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Issues with this topic

What do we know about this character othan than as part of Fiona Hughes's contributions to General Hospital? Storylines are full of "original research", and no indication of impact from this character was made. Even if she is well-known to fans, third-party and independent sources do not suggest otherwise. --George Ho (talk) 20:34, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anna Devane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:03, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2012 section

Was tagged as having excessive detail. Removed a ton of unnecessary & repetitive stuff. Even tho it's still kind of long, it's probably 1/2 the size it was before I tackled it. Anyone else wants to hack some more, have at it, please! I haven't watched GH in yrs, but maybe someone who has can trim off more detail? What this pg really needs is more sourcing.ScarletRibbons (talk) 08:51, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]