Jump to content

Talk:Anna Quindlen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

New intereview

[edit]

NPR: detailed Bastique ☎ call me! 15:53, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anna Quindlen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:51, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Anna Quindlen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:11, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Anna Quindlen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:45, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The author's personal website

[edit]

I just happened to pick up a book by this author and, wishing to inform myself on her, came here. This article about her is in principle fine, and informative enough..., BUT:

What is the point of having her personal website linked (and twice, too) if you'd need a password to call it up ?

It's of course Anna Quindlen's right to protect her website with a password, and no doubt she had very good reasons to do so..., but I feel that under these circumstances it would be better to remove the link(s). OR, if there is a fan club or something of the sort the members of which do have the password, put in some explanatory remark (like "only for fan club members" or similar). As it is, it only annoys the reader. And makes him/her wonder what the public can have done to the author to prompt this (quasi hostile) reaction.

PS: I hope there is someone around here to discuss with. Looking at what preceeded, I get the impression that the talking here was so far mostly done by these so-called bots. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpa swiss (talkcontribs) 06:52, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]