Jump to content

Talk:Anna Maria Lenngren

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Anna Maria Lenngren/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 01:18, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be glad to take this one. More in a moment. -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:18, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on this one so far. This article has a lot going for it: it appears likely to cover the main aspects of its subject's life, it has two good public domain images, and it seems fairly neutral. However, it seems to me that serious copy-editing will be needed before this article is ready for Good Article status. Many sentences have no end punctuation, and some sentences like "she defence the right of academic work for her gender" or " A realist, "The third class" was inspired by the French Revolution" or "Despite of her wish to remain anonymous" or " Her collected poems where published" or "She was elected into a number of literal societies and academys" need work on grammar and spelling.

Some other points that the article will need to reach GA status:

  • A lead that summarizes the article's body per WP:LEAD (ideally, the lead should touch on each of the article's sections)
  • "She is one of the best-known Swedish woman poets" -- This seems a bit like peacocking and should be more clearly attributed to a critic
  • Citations to books will need page numbers
  • The numerous very short sections should be reorganized and combined into larger ones per WP:LAYOUT

Because I think some substantial work is still needed here, I'm not listing the article for GA at this time. I hope you'll continue work on it, though, and consider renominating in the future--Lenngren sounds like an interesting figure, and your work on her article is much appreciated! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:36, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't realize you hadn't made any edits to the article yet, so I've slightly edited my comment above. I still appreciate your interest in this one, though, and I hope you'll work on it at some point in the future. Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:38, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]