Talk:Ann Hopkins

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ann Hopkins article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from Ann Hopkins appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 January 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Ann Hopkins successfully sued her employer, accounting giant Price Waterhouse, in a landmark U.S. sex-discrimination case?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ann Hopkins.

Wikipedia

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women in Business Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability?

Is Ann notable apart from her involvement in the case, and her subsequent talks and books about the case? I see information about her personal life, but those things don't make her notable... --MarkTraceur (talk) 22:11, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Wikipedia's notability guidelines state that "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." I've listed at least half a dozen reliable, independent sources that provided significant coverage of the subject. (One source is a journal publication based on her own book, so feel free to discount that one as neutral if you prefer, although it was presumably vetted by the journal's editorial board.) I could have easily provided a dozen more reliable third-party sources, but felt it unnecessary, considering the topic matter and the strength of the sources. If you think additional sources would be helpful, please let me know.

There is discussion on the biographies of living persons page about what to do for people who are notable for one event, as is the case here. I draw your attention to the example given of John Hinkley, Jr., whose article is listed as warranted even though he is known for only one event, the attempted assassination of President Reagan. The reasons given for this exception are that "the single event he was associated with ... was significant and his role was both substantial and well documented." In the case of Ann Hopkins, the event she was associated was also significant — it set an important precedent in U.S. case law that has been drawn upon and discussed many times over in the decades since — and her role was also both substantial (clearly, if it weren't for her the case wouldn't have happened) and well documented (in outlets from The New York Times, TIME magazine, the Chicago Tribune, any number of law publications, and, just this year, PBS, which included her in a highly-watched documentary featuring some of the most important women in the history of business in the United States). I didn't think it made sense to expand on Hopkins' background so much on Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, which rightly focuses on the law rather than the person, but I do believe the addition information about her early career and trajectory after the case ended provides important context for understanding her role in history. Thus, I felt a standalone article about Hopkins was warranted by Wikipedia guidelines. Girona7 (talk) 00:54, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ann Hopkins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150113004115/http://www.hofstra.edu/pdf/law_labor_Hopkins_vol22no2.pdf to http://www.hofstra.edu/pdf/law_labor_Hopkins_vol22no2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:14, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]