Jump to content

Talk:Ann E. Dunwoody

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How dare you?

[edit]

This can't be the first female four-star officer. That would be Rachel Levine. She's just been confirmed in 2021. We need to downgrade Dunwoody to three-star or something so that Levine can be the first. Cant have 2 firsts, only one can be first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:6011:A922:B70E:85DD:4631:D54D:CE17 (talk) 13:12, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Photo controversy discussion

[edit]

Proposed addition:

This content belongs in Wikipedia. I'm not sure if it belongs in this article or in an article on photo controversies in the media, with a wikilink from here linking there. Opinions?

Photo controversy

[edit]

The United States Department of Defense provided the Associated Press a photo with a digitally altered background. The Associated Press retracted the photograph.<ref name="BBCPhotoRetraction">Row over altered US Army photo, [[British Broadcasting Company]], 2008-11-19, retrieved 2008-11-19</ref><ref name="BBCPhotoRetractionPhoto">Row over altered US Army photo - attached photo "The original photo of General Ann Dunwoody, on the left, was altered before being given to the Associated Press (AP), on the right. Inset shows AP's 'Photo elimination' warning to editors.", [[British Broadcasting Company]], 2008-11-19, retrieved 2008-11-19</ref>

Discussion about above

[edit]
  • Don't Include Since there's no evidence that Dunwoody had anything to do with the photo's manipulation and distribution, it doesn't belong here. Even if she was complicit, given the trivial nature of the manipulation, I don't think this particular example is worth of mention anywhere. The intent is obviously aesthetic rather than deceptive, and the Army clearly made no effort to hide the fact that the image was manipulated (i.e., it was poorly done). Rklawton (talk) 02:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Don't include — not significant with respect to Dunwoody. This might be appropriate for an article with respect to photo manipulation in the media — which is the norm for fashion magazines, etc. — ERcheck (talk) 02:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to add some information and edit this page. I found some really great sources and more in depth information on Dunwoody. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.21.147.61 (talk) 14:33, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dunwoody Institute?

[edit]

Does anyone know if she is related to the Minneapolis businessman William Hood Dunwoody, who founded Dunwoody Institute, in 1914 in Minneapolis, MN.?
{See also Dunwoody_Village#William_Hood_Dunwoody.}
LP-mn (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ann E. Dunwoody. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:04, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]