This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
It would be helpful to have a little more information about what specifically is wrong with this article in terms of both notability of the subject and the tone of the article. It was written as part of a class assignment for a dance history class and the assignment was structured to address both of those issues. The article also contains multiple references to authoritative print sources. Thanks.
Metarox (talk) 23:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I stumbled across your article via WP:WPNN and I must say, if you wrote this article you did a fine job. If I may give a suggestion, on Wikipedia, references are more accepted among editors when they can be viewed online. Don't get me wrong, I'm glad you referenced books as well, it's just that most readers find it convenient to just click on a link to verify rather then running to the library.However, I am just running through it linking the appropriate pages and I will remove the notability template after I look everything over and it satisfies WP:BIO. Amor amor (talk) 09:36, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In the "Tackling Issues" section the first three sentances sound like original research. In various places (I highlighted some witin the article) there are weasel like words and phrases (see Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words) that diminish the nuetral point of view tone. As you can see in the history, I deleted one sentence that was just down right very peacockish (see Wikipedia:Peacock) and I don't beleive it diminished the article. I think there may be other words and pharases that could also be eliminated or supported via a ciation. Pknkly (talk) 04:45, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
