Talk:Anime Mid-Atlantic

Anime and manga: Conventions Low‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Conventions work group.

Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment

Reduced to stub-class. If it's a stub, it can't be start-class. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 06:31, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Attendance figures

I noticed on the Administrator' noticeboard that there is a dispute about the attendance figures. It appears that there are actually two figures for total attendance: one figure for paid attendees, and the other figure for "warm" bodies (i.e. those who didn't pay, but managed to get in).

I do think that it's a little misleading to have an attendance figure without at least explaining that there are two sets of attendance counts. Could we not list both in the table, with an explanation of what both the figures mean? - Letsbefiends (talk) 04:17, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Usually this isn't done, some larger articles such as Otakon and Anime Expo are the few that do something similar, but it could be done with some sort of note tag or marking them in parentheses. You might have misunderstood the original dispute, it was the attendance numbers were un-sourced and couldn't be verified, were being edited, threats were made, leading to the conflict. Ironically Animecons.com which is considered an Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Online reliable sources has been updated with attendance numbers, but with the table deleted (Which I don’t agree with) I’m not sure this is going to happen. Esw01407 (talk) 00:09, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Animecons.com

The problem I see with this article is Animecons.com which is a user submitted info site and therefore unreliable. To add the Event history the guests need to have an additional source for them such as ANN which I did see info there. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:52, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anime Mid-Atlantic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120620000656/http://hamptonroads.com/2012/06/fanboys-fangirls-light-chesapeake-anime-festival to http://hamptonroads.com/2012/06/fanboys-fangirls-light-chesapeake-anime-festival

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]