Talk:Animal psychopathology

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disability

Animal psychopathology is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Autism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Title

I think Animal Psychopathology is a misnomer. What is meant here is "animal models of human neuropsychiatric disorders". Something that is pathologic in a human being may be rather normal in an animal, although that does not exclude that this animal might be a good model for some human condition. As it stands now, I am not sure that this article is useful. If it is to be about animal models, than a more complete enumeration would be warranted. --Crusio 22:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, while these disorders are similar to human disorders, they are separate conditions in their own right. Animal psychology is its own subject of study, not necessarily in the context of modeling human abnormalities. --Iamozy (talk) 20:03, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apathy

"Being apathetic can have a fitness advantage for the organism." - this is probably the weirdest thing I've read on Wikipedia. Apathy is no hibernation. This should be explained or have at least have a reference. --78.54.8.22 (talk) 08:05, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality of article

This article has numerous problems with examples in incorrect sections (e.g. why discuss rats and beetles in Thin Sow Syndrome?) The section on eating disorders starts with "Animals in the wild appear to be relatively free from eating disorders although their body composition fluctuates depending on seasonal and reproductive cycles. However, domesticated animals including farm, laboratory and pet animals are prone to disorders. Evolutionary fitness drives feeding behavior in wild animals. The expectation is that farm animals also display this behavior, but questions arise if the same principles apply to laboratory and pet animals." This does not make sense in so many ways...what is the relevance of body composition? Do only domesticated animals show eating disorders - what about zoo animals? Does fitness have nothing to do with feeding behaviour in non-wild animals? Which questions "arise"? I suggest this article needs a thorough re-write.__DrChrissy (talk) 19:35, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Animal psychopathology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070815165813/http://www.curedisease.com:80/Perspectives/vol_1_1989/Learned%20Helplessness.html to http://www.curedisease.com/Perspectives/vol_1_1989/Learned%20Helplessness.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:19, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Useless redirect

Zoochosis redirects to this article, but isn’t mentioned at all. ZFT (talk) 00:00, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]