Talk:Angry Grandpa/Archive 1

Archive 1

Pee Wee Gaskins

Charles did a video series about having a friendship with Gaskins years back and even said that [Charles] name was etched on a pentagram inside Gaskins' cell when they went on a tour of the prison he was kept in (when it was abandoned). If we could find sources and evidence about this to write in the article, it would be an interesting addition. -- Ruldolf (talk) 04:35, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

A couple of corrections

Just wanted to add that Charles actually has five kids, not four. He says so towards the end of this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSvfJCxjCj8

Also, I kinda have to vote to remove the "Religion" bit from his information box. Although he has claimed to believe in a god in several occasions, I don't think he has ever identified himself as a Christian and in one of the many videos, he made about Casey Anthony, he claims he is "not a religious person". This one, to be exact: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4QnU0egSuQ -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.81.196.72 (talk) 15:04, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Should we keep the article on Angry Grandpa?

I, while I may be a big fan of the Angry Grandpa Show myself, I'd suggest that we delete this article as certain snippets (ex. the names of his children) are unsourced. Also, I think that nay article about a YouTube "celebrity" that has less than 10 million subscribers should not have a Wikipedia article as it doesn't have a wide enough audience of an article. if any of you feel that this article should be kept, please let me know what your thoughts on this is. --HoHHo56Oy (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

The article passes WP:GNG in my opinion, so it should remain. Unsourced names of non-notable people should be removed per WP:BLPNAME.LM2000 (talk) 19:44, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

About Angry Grandpa's Swear Word

Did you guys know that Angry Grandpa's swear word is 'goddamn'? Hey, listen to this. Angry Grandpa says, 'Shut your goddamn mouth'. Did you get what he's saying? And now Angry Grandpa says, 'What the hell are you guys talkin' about?'. And then Angry Grandpa says, 'Shit yourself, motherfucker! Shit your goddamn pants.' Isn't his quotes funny?

Pipe wrench

What's going on with this IP editor? Did he destroy Michael's PS4 with a pipe wrench or not? The IP is also asking to confirm by looking at the episode in question. -- jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 21:12, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

This is what he is using PLAIN AND SIMPLE! Go look at it! http://www.stanleytools.com/en-us/products/hand-tools/demolition-tools/pry-claw-bars/15-in-fatmax-fubar-utility-bar/55-119 It's NOT a pipe wrench! Quit reverting my edits! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.189.89.221 (talk) 21:21, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Instead of reverting and risking getting myself blocked for violating WP:3RR, I've added the information according to your evidence. Thank you. --

jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 21:40, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Now, what about your source for the five children case? -- jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 00:09, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Here's the source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSvfJCxjCj8 Any more questions? FYI I am not here to vandalize Wikipedia! I only put factual information, unlike other people! -- 173.189.89.221 (talk) 00:22, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

I know you're not vandalizing, but please see WP:3RR for a better explanation of why I warned you. You reverted 4 times; a violation of the rule. --

jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 06:35, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

If you know I'm not vandalizing, then why would you remove factual information? Makes no sense! You leave information that has no source, but will not accept any new information that actually has a source! Then you ask for proof, but the proof is right there, it proves itself if you would just look! Instead you revert it back to information that has no proof, it is just automatically taken as fact for some reason! Nice way to punish someone who actually knows something and pays attention! 173.189.89.221 (talk) 10:02, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

You're only being punished for the aggressive reverting in violation of 3RR. I have also added the correct information instead of just blatantly removing content like you did. Please consider what I have done when you return to the encyclopedia. -- jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 00:11, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

The content was NOT blatantly removed! I removed content that was obviously incorrect just like any person would do that wants stuff to be correct which you obviously do not! I even stated why, that it was not a pipe wrench, but that wasn't good enough for you! That is a simple explanation! Something that is factually not a pipe wrench is a pipe wrench until proven that it isn't? Does that make any sense? So I can call anything on here anything I want and you have to prove that it isn't that even though in reality it isn't that? Content being removed that has no source or is poorly sourced does not fall under the 3RR rule. You should have checked the source of the other content before removing correct content! 173.189.89.221 (talk) 00:44, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

• @Jd22292: Please keep commentary focused on content, not contributors. @173.189.89.221: please refrain from edit warring. If you are reverted, discuss. Swarm ♠ 16:23, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Children

Please do not change Angry Grandpa's children back to four! IP 173.189.89.221 clarified a few weeks ago from their observations of the channel (yes, the channel itself can be used as a source) that the subject does indeed have five children. It's possible because I haven't seen the channel myself, that the fifth child is only mentioned rather than shown on the channel. I cannot provide full details on why we have to reject this change, but if any page watcher wants to confirm the five children case, please do so. But until an editor confirms the IP's statement, please do not change it back. Thank you. -- jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 06:32, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 10 December 2017

Angry Grandpa passed away on the 10th of December 2017. This was announced by his son on Twitter (https://twitter.com/Lyricoldrap/status/939982613430915072). -- Psychoticflora (talk) 22:33, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Already done Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 01:07, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 December 2017

AGParmy (talk) 09:35, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

 Not done No request.LM2000 (talk) 10:02, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

R.I.P.

R.I.P. Angry Grandpa -- 2600:8800:3981:7A80:194E:E87A:2510:F53C (talk) 23:27, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 December 2017

Sethbeaulieu (talk) 02:54, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 04:03, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 2 January 2018

2605:A000:4845:900:FC22:74DC:2CF7:CE04 (talk) 14:46, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

tina is still married to grandpa

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 15:25, 2 January 2018 (UTC)