Talk:Anglican Diocese of Westminster

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity: Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Low-importance).

On 13 February 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Diocese of Westminster (Church of England) to Anglican Diocese of Westminster. The result of the discussion was moved.

Border

Where was the boundary between Westminster and London here? What was London left with? (Essex and itself? What about the Tower Hamlets?) Morwen - Talk 08:54, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image request

It would be good to see the coat of arms. Sources are scarce, but include this. D B D 21:32, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Diocese of Westminster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160308020110/http://www.churchofengland.org/media/40671/chapter5.pdf to http://www.churchofengland.org/media/40671/chapter5.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:57, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 February 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Uncontested RM (closed by non-admin page mover) ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 01:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Diocese of Westminster (Church of England) → Anglican Diocese of Westminster – I know that this diocese is different from other Church of England dioceses because it was short-lived, and was abolished before the first known use of the word Anglican to refer to the English Church in 1598. However, it is the only Anglican diocese with parenthetical disambiguation. The proposed target is more concise, more consistent with other Anglican dioceses and naturally disambiguated. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:17, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support I am aware of RMs arguing the other way, but preferred it be done under a wider naming convention for all dioceses. Nonetheless, this diocese is the odd one out in the ad-hoc consensus, using "Anglican", so a bit WP:CONSISTENT. Dank Jae 23:26, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.