Talk:Angelfish (band)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Scotland Start‑class Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The rest of the guys who were in Anglefish now have a new band.....Isa & the Filthy Tongues (http://isaandthefilthytongues.com)

Album

I put a track listing to their album, but its removed. Is it really necessary to make a seperate album article for this band? I don't even know what kind of information you can put to it except for tracks and personnel, being an indie album that's only notable for starting Shirley's career. Shadowolf 05:33, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not really!! ANGELFISH were a side product of a great band called GOODBYE MR MACKENZIE...therefore it's of interest even for that reason. The Mackenzies had links stretching as far as NIRVANA and obviously GARBAGE...therefore it's a bit rich to say that it's notable only for starting Shirleys career. Shirley sang with the Mackenzies for about 6/7 years before they did the ANGELFISH album.

(If you could, sign your name with 4 tildes (~) after what you write). Shirley was found in Angelfish though when Butch Vig and the others saw the video to "Suffocate Me" on MTV. Even then, Angelfish only ever produced one album and the page has enough space to fit their only album in here... much like Temple of the Dog (or any other short-lived side project collaborations between bands). The album and history information can stick in one page. It's not necessary at all to split them into two. I'm sticking it back in. Shadowolf 00:30, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Angelfish.JPG

Image:Angelfish.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]