Talk:Angel Yin

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Golf Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Golf, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Golf-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GolfWikipedia:WikiProject GolfTemplate:WikiProject GolfGolf articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport: Golf Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Women's golf task force.

What's notable

Based on what I've seen in other articles about golfers, it is not necessary to leave out any accomplishment other than a win. A top ten finish should be good enough, given that some articles reach down to highlight 20th place: Here's a sentence from Rory McElroy's bio: "He finished the tournament tied for 20th place, two strokes under par for the tournament." Perhaps if an article has become overly lengthy, it's time to cut, but that ought to be discussed in the talk page before a cleaver is unilaterally applied. VanEman (talk) 17:41, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wins are definitely notable, runner-up finishes are usually notable, best finishes if the player hasn't won are notable, top-10 finishes in majors are notable. If the article contains a summary by year/season, then top-10 finishes are usually noted but the included/reverted top-10 finish seems out of place. Why mention this one top-10 finish out of several in her career. There is nothing particular about this tournament as relates to this golfer, i.e. it isn't the best she's finished in her national open or a tournament that she is somehow connected to. So while the addition was factually correct, it's inclusion could be misleading to a reader as to it's notability. (P.S. The sentance from McIlroy's article refers to his finish in his first Masters Tournament and was part of several paragraphs on his 2009 performances - not the same.) Tewapack (talk) 20:07, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't seen anything that makes this other than your personal opinion. If it's factual and relevant and newspapers viewed it as important enough to mention, then it's notable. Another example: Annie Park : "Later in the year, at the Buick LPGA Shanghai, Park finished in a tie for second, one stroke behind winner Danielle Kang.[13]" Furthermore, the definition of "notability" for golfers does not even require that they've won any tournament: Golf[edit] Shortcut WP:NGOLF Golf figures are presumed notable if:

They have competed in the Ryder Cup, Presidents Cup, Solheim Cup or similar international competition They are enshrined in one of golf's recognized Halls of Fame (example: World Golf Hall of Fame) They have won at least one professional golf tournament (example: PGA Tour, LPGA Tour, European Tour, PGA Tour Champions) They have won at least one recognized amateur golf tournament at the national or international level (example: U.S. Amateur, British Amateur) They have made the cut in one of the four Men's major golf championships, one of the Women's major golf championships (past or present) or one of the Senior major golf championships (past or present) They have competed as a professional on the PGA, LPGA, European, or Champions Tour for at least one full year

Because ranking is based on points rather than the number of "wins", a player could be top ranked without having ANY wins. That would make for a silly article that says they're top ranked but without mentioning their performance at tournaments. As it says above even making the cut in some tournaments makes them notable.

VanEman (talk) 05:43, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The issue here is not to do with the notability of the person (WP:N), I don't think anyone is doubting that she qualifies. The issue at hand is what information should be included in the article. This is often a matter of balance. One principle is that recent events should have no preference over old events. On that basis, listing a tie for 4th place in the Australian Open only makes sense if we also list similar performances in the past. Yin was 2nd in the 2018 CP Women's Open (33.6 WWGR points) but this is not mentioned in the article. Her recent performance where she gained 9.99 WWGR points seems less impressive. Indeed it is her 8th most important finish based on WWGR points. Mentioning the 8th best but not mentioning 6 of the 7 above that, gives an unbalanced view. Nigej (talk) 15:35, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]