Talk:Anecdotal cognitivism

Animals Low‑importance

Anecdotal cognitivism is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of Science Low‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

On 3 September 2006 Angusmclellan tagged this article, Anecdotal cognitivism, with Template:notability and Template:cleanup. I agree 100% with the clean-up tag. The notability tag is more problematic. The discussion of a scientific term, maybe especially a 19th Century one as this one is, is not within the guidelines enumerated by the Template:notability tag. However inartfully the editor expressed himself/herself, this methodology was the one that Darwin employed, as well as George Romanes and others, and it is in stark contrast to the Behaviorism research model that was the predominant one in the XXth Century. I believe that it is important to document the history of science, especially since the pendulum often swings back, a classic example is Continental drift. Is anyone aware of guidelines for Category:History of science articles? Unless Angusmclellan or others object, I will remove the notability tag but keep the clean-up tag. The work of historiographic researchers like Colin Allen, D. Jamieson and M. Bekoff needs to be reviewed, and the connections to modern Ethology need to be explored in the literature. No, I am not suggesting original research, just a review of what exists. Signed: Bejnar 02:28, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History of Zoology or History of Social Sciences

On 13 October 2006 Ragesoss changed the category for this article from Category:History of science to Category:History of social sciences. Since Social sciences deal with human behaviour and societies (at least according to the social sciences article), I question whether categorizing Anecdotal cognitivism, a method for interpreting animal behaviour, as a social science is correct. Is there a branch of the social sciences which studies animal behaviour? Is ethology a social science? Bejnar 19:50, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[Perhaps unjustly, perhaps not] ethology is a social science (in addition to a biological sciencce) in Wikipedia's classification system: ethology-->behavioural sciences-->social sciences. I removed it from the History of science supercategory because that is too broad, but I don't have an objection to adding it to History of biology as well as or instead of History of social sciences.--ragesoss 21:40, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at ethology, which according to the article is distinct from comparative psychology; it seems like this would fall under the latter, in which case it would probably best be considered a History of social sciences topic.--ragesoss 21:47, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

unclear definition

leading definition paragraph is too ambiguous and unclear!! Maysara (talk) 16:40, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Anecdotal cognitivism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:04, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]