Talk:Andrija Puharich

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Andrija Puharich article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Paranormal

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Article clean-up and content addition

There is a lot of crap online about Puharich, one concerning the water splitter - he never claimed the device had an energy net gain. The energy is already present in the water (hydrogen and oxygen) plus you need to add current to split it apart. The energy out is still less than the electrical and chemical energy combined. A good analogy would be if you set a forest on fire with a match, is the energy released in the forest fire contained within the match? His device is more efficient than Faradayian electrolysis, but it doesn't smash the laws of physics.

The Puharich family has put together a good website detailing his life.

All of that said, he was far out when compared to traditional university scientists. That is why he was so successful in his work.

Refs removed

user:JzG removed:

http://www.rexresearch.com/puharich/1puhar.htm The water splitting patent

POV and not encyclopedic style

"Puharich was a fearless explorer who delved deeply and with a focused intelligence into the realms of medicine, healing, psychic phenomena, human nature and paranormal abilities, often in the face of irrational criticism or ridicule from more staid scientists and physicians. His constancy and scholarly approach, however, offered a role model for future scientists and researchers, who follow his lead in blending medicine and parapsychology, and continue to investigate the most unusual aspects of existence."

What else, poor victim of every other human on earth, because they all don't understand his godlike powers? Or just the last American hero? Or Marilyn Monroe in disguise? Maybe all of the above!? Oh come on, I'll delete it until someone is able to write something more objective...even Einstein isn't praised like that on Wikipedia, eh? Eh? MH —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.55.160.26 (talk) 19:43, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Phenemona Phenomena

It says "usefulness of paranormal phenemona." Shouldn't it be "phenomena"? Shoesoft93 (talk) 08:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]