Jump to content

Talk:Andrew Sandlin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Christian Fundamentalist?

[edit]

I think that many Fundamentalists would think it's pretty amusing that Sandlin would be categorized a "Christian fundamentalist". A "Reformed catholic", an ex-Reconstructionist, a postmodernist, an ecumenist, a post-millenialist and ... a Christian fundamentalist? Truly all things to all men!

Seriously, there are better labels to apply to this man. "Christian fundamentalist" sounds like some kind of left-handed jab. — Mark (Mkmcconn) ** 00:45, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

00:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC)00:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC)00:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC)00:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC)00:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC)00:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC)00:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC)66.121.137.90 00:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Get to know the man!

[edit]

My recommendation to anyone reading this about Andrew, and having questions about him, is to first take time to read his blogs and writings, not just some simplified and wholy inadequate precîs. Secondly, I would recommend calling him and getting to know him. Andrew is very forthcoming and eagerly explains his positions and thinking with clarity and grace. His understanding of and commitment to Sola Scriptura is unequivocal. 66.121.137.90 00:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC) Don Broesamle -- broesamle@earthlink.net[reply]

Good article on Calvinism

[edit]

Sandlin also wrote one of the best things I've seen on Calvinism:

-- TimNelson 14:02, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tone

[edit]

This article, while short, is unusually hagiographic and reads more like a CV than an encyclopedia article. The first sentence especially is tediously long. The first sentence of a WP article should establish what the subject is notable for, not a list of everything done. Is anyone acquainted enough with Sandlin to identify his key notability? Ashmoo (talk) 09:36, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]