Jump to content

Talk:Andrew Lovett

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment completed for Andrew Lovett

[edit]


As per either a recent request at section for assessment requests or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: some choppy use of language, needs referencing

However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question.

ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it.--VS talk 10:55, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Downplay of criminal offenses ==

+ - This article has one short paragraph, at the very end. It has no heading, despite this dude being a nobody except and AFL rapist. That is this guy's claim to fame ;rapist. Good to see he abuses his partners too. - The rest of this article is wholly unencyclopedic, random titbits of unreferenced stuff amidst all but one reference that he is a sex offender. Has this article been written by his family or sports club? It is an appalling article.


BLP policy issues

[edit]

I removed a number of sentences from the article that made very specific claims about Lovett's behaviour. These, if they are to be included MUST be supported with references that actually support what is being said in the article. Otherwise there is a breach of WP:BLP policy. This policy always applies, but when someone is facing criminal charges, it is pobably even more important that the article meets this policy very exactly. Wikipeterproject (talk) 08:17, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll be going through it later tonight and cleaning up unreferenced AFL data, but the first priority should be BLP problems. - Bilby (talk) 08:25, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-07-20/lovett-used-victim-for-his-sexual-pleasure2c-court-told/2802766 BLP irrelevant. He was convicted of abuse. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.174.169.54 (talk) 02:41, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is incorrect. He has not been convicted. - Bilby (talk) 07:40, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Andrew Lovett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:33, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]