This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Kliman is evidently a notableeconomist, if anything as the author of a modern seminal work.[1][2] The subject meets the criteria required by the pertinent rule, i.e. the person is regarded as an important figure and widely cited by peers or successors; he created a work that's been the subject of independent articles and reviews. -The Gnome (talk) 22:00, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Andrew Kliman is not a notableeconomist, and the book "Reclaiming Marx's 'Capital'" is not a seminal work in the field. He has not received any top awards or other honors in the field, and has not been the subject of any press coverage. The referenced quotations above are typical academic book reviews, the likes of which any academic book (notable or not) would receive. This person does not pass the professor test. --2604:2000:B093:AE00:4143:2670:A98:7D01 (talk) 19:45, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
According to rules, Wikipedia considers someone a notable individual if, among other requirements, "The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources". Further specifications indicate that "Criterion 1 can also be satisfied if the person has pioneered or developed a significant new concept, technique or idea, made a significant discovery or solved a major problem in their academic discipline. In this case it is necessary to explicitly demonstrate, by a substantial number of references to academic publications of researchers other than the person in question, that this contribution is indeed widely considered to be significant and is widely attributed to the person in question.". Kliman and McGlone are two of the originators of the Temporal Single System Interpretation, which is an interpretation of Marx's theory of value. I think that fulfills the criteria. 193.145.201.52 (talk) 07:57, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
References
^"In Reclaiming Marx's 'Capital' , Kliman's arguments...operate like a buzz saw clearing away the underbrush of misplaced criticisms that have kept the real 'Capital' hidden from most of its potential readers. The project is much needed, and brilliantly and clearly (and for this reader, convincingly) executed." : Bertell Ollman
^"In Reclaiming Marx's 'Capital' , Andrew Kliman...sorts out a bewildering tangle of approaches and issues in order to demonstrate that the charge of internal inconsistency is false. ... Specialists cannot afford to neglect Kliman's argument. Non-specialists will find that Kliman not only argues but teaches." : Thomas Jeannot, Gonzaga University
