Jump to content

Talk:Andrew D. Chumbley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

A question: Is an online blurb from an online "magazine" that has it's acknowledged source as a chat/egroup a reliable source of information? Should information there be considered authoritative? Posting his cause of death has nothing to do with who he was, what he did, or why he's included in Wiki. I have always been creeped out by the inclusion of cause of death, considering it an infringement of his privacy since it has nothing to do with his notability. Must we include this added bit? Is it important?Lulubyrd (talk) 00:54, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The link does not go to an article; it goes to a disambiguation page. Ambiguous links should be directed to the correct article, which I thought I had done by correcting it to Petwo (also spelled Petro), which defines one of two contrasting and often-paired Haitian Vodou sects (Rada and Petro). But you seemed to think that that was wrong. So I tried to prod you into supplying a useful link instead of mindlessly reverting to an unhelpful ambiguous link. Where would you like it to go? Haitian vodou#Loa? Or have you reconsidered Petwo, which would be more accurate, especially if the article were expanded? In any case the link should be changed to direct to a relevant article, or removed.--ShelfSkewed Talk 18:00, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

00:15, 28 March 2009 (UTC)00:15, 28 March 2009 (UTC)00:15, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Why do you think Petwo is the correct direction? What is mindless about being directed to a disambiguation page? Why do you think it's all right for you to call me mindless? You need a lesson in manners as well as what influenced Chumbley. It is apparent that you know little about Chumbley or his influences, but instead are making changes based upon your need to be an expert on Vodou. Go talk to Schulke; after all it's in reference to his comment. Or perhaps you should talk to Frizvold. He'll know. Lulubyrd (talk) 00:15, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Directing a link to a disambiguation page is rarely helpful, and I don't see how it is in this case. The quote refers to "Petro Voodoo", but neither the quote nor the Chumbley article in general offers enough context to tell people what that is, and, should a reader follow the link, the dab page offers no guidance either. I'm not an expert on voodoo, and I'm not trying to pretend that I am; I was simply trying, by disambiguating the link, to send users to an article that might give them some useful information about what Petro Voodoo is. (And then, by removing the link, trying to remove the false promise that the link would offer something useful.) Perhaps you could help me understand by explaining what your reason is for insisting on a link to a dab page. How does that help a reader understand Chumbley or his beliefs and influences?--ShelfSkewed Talk 03:24, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite First Paragraph Sept. 2010

[edit]

Hi Midnightblueowl: Some comments regarding your edit:

You wrote: "Andrew D. Chumbley' (September 15, 1967 – September 15, 2004) was an English occultist, ceremonial magician, writer and artist. He developed his own form of contemporary witchcraft which became known as Sabbatic Witchcraft and in 1991 founded a closed circle of initiates, the Cultus Sabbati, of which he acted as Magister.[1] He helped to propagate his tradition through a series of grimoires that he wrote and published throughout the 1990s and early 2000s, most notably Azoëtia, Qutub and One, and helped to found two publishing companies, Xoanon and Three Hands Press, through which to release high quality publications on magic and witchcraft. "

You removed a reference. Why? That reference is there for a reason. Please read old material in archived discussion for the reason the reference is there. What makes the term "English people" appropriate? Where are your references for "occultist, and ceremonial magician"? Where are you getting your reference for the use of the term witchcraft as in "contemporary witchcraft" and "Sabbatic witchcraft"? Please give a solid reference where Chumbley referred to what he did as witchcraft in combination with Sabbatic. The Cultus Sabbati info is already in the article. Regarding how he "helped to propagate his tradition", please note your specific reference that he propagated his tradition so I may look it up. This sounds a bit like an interpretation. The rest of your edit is already in the article. New material that is thoroughly documented would be great here, but what you placed in the article looks like hearsay and much is already there. If you want to rewrite any parts of the article, please adhere to encyclopedic style and rigour. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lulubyrd (talk • contribs) 01:37, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Membership of IOT

[edit]

Could we do a reality-check on the claim that Chumbley was a member of the IOT (Illuminates of Thanateros)? There is no direct evidence that he was, and hearsay evidence indicates that he was not; the ref. cited is Dave Evans' book (2007).

As I don't have a copy of Evans' book to hand, so could someone post here the relevant passage(s) and we can have a look at that?

Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reineke (talk • contribs) 15:59, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As no-one has responded to this request, I will remove the comment for the time being. reineke (talk) 11:35, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.lashtal.com/nuke/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=279
    Triggered by \blashtal\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 17:31, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Andrew D. Chumbley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:20, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Andrew D. Chumbley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:36, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Andrew_D._Chumbley&oldid=1200898545"