Talk:André Beauneveu

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Untitled

I have photos of the Bourges prophet windows which I'll pop into WikiCommons and add here soon as I get the chance. If anyone has photos of the Effigy of Charles V or the St Catherine in Kortrijk, those would be much appreciated here.

Will finish formatting,proofing and adding refs over the next week.

Rohan Hours

Nice work! I see from "what links here" there is talk of JB there - I've no idea how these theories are considered today, but ideally the two articles should be harmonized. Are you putting this up for WP:DYK? Johnbod (talk) 16:05, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Johnbod - I'm new to WP so glad to know I haven't made a complete hash of things (so far)! Hadn't spotted the Rohan Hours article so glad you pointed it out. To be frank the attribution of the RH to AB is errant nonsense. Even Meiss (who dates the RH earlier than most) put it in the 1420's - i.e. at least 20 years after the death of AB (who's mentioned as 'recently deceased' in a doc of around 1403). I fear this is another example of people assuming that all surviving artworks must have been by the hand of one of the small number of named masters. Having looked at the ref cited in the RH hours, I think it needs bringing in line with more conventional Art Historical opinion as there's some wonderful flights of fancy there. Will try to get this article a bit more nailed down before looking at the various bits that link to it...

(Sorry but no idea what WP:DYK is - will have to read the help files and get back to you.) StuartLondon (talk) 16:27, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I can help with/do the DYK nomination if needed - let me know if you do one, & I'll check it. It gets the article launch publicity & I think is worth doing. Ideally you should sprinkle refs to the two main books at intervals, at least 1 per para & at any point that is very specific to one work - I just use ref>Smith, 225</ref> etc. Johnbod (talk) 16:41, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on André Beauneveu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080723200155/http://www.insecula.com/oeuvre/O0000321.html to http://www.insecula.com/oeuvre/O0000321.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:18, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]