Talk:Andhadhun/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Veera Narayana (talk · contribs) 04:59, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello there! Reviewing tonight. Veera Narayana 04:59, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- There are some places where citations are needed. Look for them.
- The post-production section has got nothing really to talk about post production. It actually acquits itself well in the above two sections of the production.
- Some minors here and there, though not compelling issues for a GA.
Solid work overall. I though it would go for a direct pass, but, there are things that needed to be addressed. Let me know ehen you are done. Veera Narayana 08:26, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Veera Narayana Resolved your above queries. Sorry for the late response. Yashthepunisher (talk) 20:27, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
- Pass or Fail:
- Veera Narayana Thanks for the review. Yashthepunisher (talk) 07:41, 15 December 2019 (UTC)