Talk:Anderson Valley

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I added a link in the External Links section to a 71Miles' article, but did not change any other part of the entry. 71Miles is my company. Our articles are a valuable resource to Wikipedia readers when presented in the appropriate context. Our articles are written to inform readers about a destination. To include them in the External Link section is to use that section exactly as it is intended. I have seen multiple instance where links to The New York Times articles and other prominent publications are included in External Link sections on similar topics. Since our writers have been published by the New York Times and other prominent publications, and 71Miles articles are of equal quality, it would have to be bias against independent publishers not to include our links while allowing the Times' links to remain. (Asruge 18:17, 4 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Sparsely populated?

The WP:LEDE currently says that AV is "sparsely populated". Is that legit? Certainly, by central/near northern California coastal standards that may be the case. But isn't the term, without context, more of an opinion than a fact? If you were in, say, central Alaska, you might consider Anderson Valley quite the metropolis. I suggest we either qualify that with some details, or else move the whole issue of population density to the body of the article. Thx, - Wikidemon (talk) 09:21, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]