Talk:Andersen–Tawil syndrome/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Canada Hky (talk · contribs) 00:02, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello! I am happy to review this article for GA status. I will go through and make some comments as I read, and then will run through the checklist at the end, to make sure I haven't missed anything. Canada Hky (talk) 00:02, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Initial comments
[edit]- No copyvio issues.
- Images all look good.
- In the lead - can you explicitly call out the triad of diagnostic findings? The last sentence refers to the triad, but I had to go back and piece together what it was - something similar to the first sentence of the signs and symptoms section. Done
- Sub out "mutation" for "variant" or "pathogenic variant". Done
- In the "Cause" section, "mutation" is linked well after its first usage - is there a specific reason for this decision? Done
- For the table in the "Cause" section - while the abbreviation 'ATS' is pretty easy to guess - it isn't defined in the article. Done
- In the "Diagnosis" section - the text says "if 2/3 criteria are met", but there are 4 different criteria listed. Done
- There is inconsistency between "long qt syndrome" and "Long QT syndrome" - I would suggest the former, as it isn't a proper noun, but it should definitely be consistent. Done
- Reference 12 should have an access date. Done
I will update if I find anything else. Please let me know if there are any questions. I am going to put the article on hold for now. If you think you will need more than the standard 7 days, just let me know. Canada Hky (talk) 00:23, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks Canada Hky. I actioned all the points you have raised above - thanks for spotting those errors. Anything else? PeaBrainC (talk) 09:02, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Checklist
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall: Thanks for the opportunity to review this article. It was easy to read, focused and comprehensive!
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: