Jump to content

Talk:And Then There Were Fewer/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GRAPPLE X 15:57, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


I never got this far with Family Guy. I always thought it started losing steam around season 4 or 5, when the whole sitcom thing was phased out for the cutaways. Season 1 is still absolutely genius though. Enough of me, review time.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Not seeing any problems with the prose style.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    MOS is fine.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
    Citations are fine, no problems there.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
    Scope is good. Not too narrow or too broad.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Article is neutral and unbiased.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    History is stable and uncontroversial.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Commons images are fine, but the FUR on File:And Then There Were Fewer - Family Guy promo.png seems like a cut-and-paste job - it mentions " the themes behind the character", which is entirely irrelevant. Rewrite it to be specific to the file in question.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Overall the article is ready to pass, though I would still like to see that image given a better rationale. Well done! GRAPPLE X 15:57, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]