Talk:And Then There Were Fewer/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: GRAPPLE X 15:57, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I never got this far with Family Guy. I always thought it started losing steam around season 4 or 5, when the whole sitcom thing was phased out for the cutaways. Season 1 is still absolutely genius though. Enough of me, review time.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Citations are fine, no problems there.
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Scope is good. Not too narrow or too broad.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Article is neutral and unbiased.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- History is stable and uncontroversial.
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Commons images are fine, but the FUR on File:And Then There Were Fewer - Family Guy promo.png seems like a cut-and-paste job - it mentions " the themes behind the character", which is entirely irrelevant. Rewrite it to be specific to the file in question.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Overall the article is ready to pass, though I would still like to see that image given a better rationale. Well done! GRAPPLE X 15:57, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail: