Talk:Ancient Rome: The Rise and Fall of an Empire

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ancient Rome: The Rise and Fall of an Empire article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television: British Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

BBC Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removed link for Nick Murphy

I don't think this Nick Murphy is the same one who wrote this series. TNaran 03:54, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1960322/ 24.141.147.213 16:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Historic "accuracy"?

A word about it? The series puts effect over information anyway, but there seem to be some major flaws in it. I'm not a historian, but a great fan of the "Masters of Rome" series by Colleen McCullough (that has a reputation for thorough research). The "Caesar" episode claims that Caesar wanted to be in office "without election" like a king and was a proto-Emperor anyway, while CMC explains that he wanted to stand for election "in absentia", so that he would not have to enter the city and lose his official power over his troops. Maybe the film script didn't leave time to really explain something about roman politics? Also, that later he "made himself" dictator for life, while in CMCs view it was one of the many "unwanted" honors awarded him by a cajoling senate. I guess it depends on what sources you believe in, but this series seems to interpret history in an artistic fashion - the most interesting rumors must be true ;-) - while it lacks real background information (or maybe even real information). Also take a look at the series "Terry Jones's Barbarians" for the other truth about the Sacking of Rome, and as an antidote to Empire fever. An Amazon customer put it right: "Rome For Dummies".—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.189.174.62 (talk) 05:04, 14 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I need answers

A while back, I made some major edits throughout this topic. The synopsis of each episode was thin and did not explain fully what was actually shown on TV. For that reason I patched things up with more relevant detail and I personally think it was a good idea to do so. But someone has reverted all my efforts and edits to improve this article's quality. I want to know why. You cannot claim that I had put too much detail, the plot outlines were still a paragraph long for each episode I worked on. Can someone please answer this question? A Prodigy ^(t•c•m) 18:47, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History Channel's Rome: Rise and Fall of an Empire

There is also a History channel series of the same name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JanderVK (talk • contribs) 04:24, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Italics

I'm removing the completely overboard use of Italics in this article, as is consistent with Wikipedia policy. Master z0b (talk) 00:38, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Constantine’s asteroid

The asteroid that Constantine saw was far to big and it hit the ground and causes a shock wave no less if that hade happened in 312 we’d know about it, have you ever seen the Meteor Crater in Arizona there would be something like the right in the Middle of Italy to day If somthing as big as that hade hit.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ancient Rome: The Rise and Fall of an Empire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090227122236/http://www.vmi.tv/HD-today/back-issues/HDTodayno5.pdf to http://www.vmi.tv/HD-today/back-issues/HDTodayno5.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:00, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]