Talk:Anchor losses
article reviewer 2
[edit]In general, this article gives a good description of the theory and the relative issues in engineering of anchor losses. However, for the part of analytical estimation, the description is a little confusing. Some more clarifications are preferred to help understanding how the mechanics theory is applied to deduce the anchor losses. YX.AN-CINA (talk) 13:03, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Review
[edit]Its a very interesting topic and very well explained but my suggestion is to make the title more specific to MEMS as its a phenomenon related to MEMS devices. Muhammadrehan645 (talk) 13:07, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Overall Evaluation
[edit]This article describes anchor losses and discusses methods to alleviate it. My suggestion is to add some commonly used research methods on anchor losses. Haotiandd (talk) 13:05, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Observations and suggestions for improvements
[edit]The following observations and suggestions for improvements were collected, following an expert review of the article within the Science, Technology, Society and Wikipedia course at the Politecnico di Milano, in July 2024.
The english must be carefully checked since sometimes the reading process is complicated. I would expand the 'analytical solution' session describing the functioning of the cantilever beam resonator and providing some more steps in the formula derivation since it is not easy to follow for non experts in the field. The same in the 'numerical estimation' session where I will provide more details on the two proposed methods in order to allow the reader to understand how to set-up such kind of simulations and also to understand better why the proposed formula is useful to estimate the Q. I suppose the half-bandwidth method has been already explained in wikipedia, so please add a link to it. If this is not the case, please provide some basics of the method.