Talk:Anbe Sivam/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 18:18, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Give me 48 hrs.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:18, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

lede

• "Inspired by the 1987 road film Planes, Trains and Automobiles, Anbe Sivam features Haasan, R. Madhavan and Kiran Rathod in the lead roles, with Nassar, Santhana Bharathi, Seema and Uma Riyaz Khan playing supporting roles." -would be better to move "Inspired by the 1987 road film Planes, Trains and Automobiles," to the next paragraph before describing what the film is about.
• " Today, however, the film is regarded as a classic and has in fact" -always avoid "in fact" in this encyclopedia.

Filming

• "American Embassy at Toronto " -link?
• " shot at a railway station in Pollachi " -can you be more precise and link?
• "Further filming was held" -held?

Themes

• "Film critic Baradwaj Rangan, in his review of another Haasan film, Vishwaroopam (2013), found the ethnicity of the characters in the film to be a continuation of Haasan's inclusion of non-Tamil characters in his films as well as an acknowledgement of the "interconnectedness of the nation" and "the world beyond India", and that the actor had experimented with the concept before in Mahanadi (1994), Nammavar (1994), Hey Ram (2000), Vettaiyaadu Vilaiyaadu (2006), Dasavathaaram (2008) and Manmadhan Ambu (2010). " -rather long, split sentence before "as well".

Legacy

• "has garnered a cult status and is now considered a classic in Tamil cinema, receiving more popularity " -too much positivity, you only need to say something like "Anbe Sivam has achieved cult status in Tamil cinema".
• "In 2014 art director Rajeevan included Prabhaharan's work in Anbe Sivam among his favourites" -seems a bit trivial, unless Rajeevan is really a prominent figure.
• There's quite a lot of cruft in the second paragraph, a lot of it reads as fanboy trivia to be honest. There's a few claims I don't think really add much value here. ""6 roles that prove he has an amazing acting range"" is pretty awful.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld: I have hopefully resolved your comments. Do let me know if there's any more changes to make.  — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 14:34, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Looks improved yup, good job!♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:27, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld: Thanks again, Doc!  — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 00:46, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.