Talk:Anatole Kaletsky

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Frame of Reference

I think it is important to understand writer's frame of reference as in their polical, social, and religious bias.

Does anyone have any information on Mr. Kaletsky's bias?

This bio, as it stands, is pretty bland.

Bilderberg

I'm a colleague of Anatole Kaletsky's at The Times newspaper, and thus would have a conflict of interest if I edited the article. I do wish to point out, however, that the source the article links to purporting to document AK's links with the Bilderberg Group is not a reliable source. It is a nutcase conspiracy-theory website that has no place whatsoever in a reference source. OliverKamm (talk) 16:36, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then you can confirm that he did attend Bilderberg and can explain why it is never covered in the mainstream press. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Evadinggrid (talk • contribs) 17:10, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All you have done with your additional reference to Bilderberg is to add one crackpot far-right conspiracy site to another. Neither of these is a recognised and reliable source, and your comment above demonstrates that you are aware that no such source for your claim exists. The claim should therefore be removed. --OliverKamm (talk) 11:12, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are privilged to be able simply ask him if he attended (you are a reputable source), and if he says he did not attend then I would be happy to delete that sentance and offer a genuine humble apology. Evadinggrid (talk) 15:39, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not necessary to give an apology, but you do need to remove a sentence for which you do not have a reliable source. --OliverKamm (talk) 16:06, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=41821 This is link] for Bilderberg conferation in Turkey 2007., and Anatole Kaletsky pariticipation — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.207.111.239 (talk) 16:34, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Right Wing

This guy is basically a right wing free marketeer who hates even the welfare state and still thinks american capitalism is the best version out there. It must be the communist dictatorship childhood that made him so right wing and revert to type. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alpha-ZX (talk • contribs) 13:57, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's nonsense. ShedPlant (talk) 21:35, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]