Jump to content

Talk:Anatole Broyard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ms. Broyard discovered that her father's ancestry was, in fact, more white than black

[edit]

There is no such thing, if you are Black you will always genetically be more black since the black gene is the dominant gene. It is prejudice like your writing that keep stories like this hidden. Good Job. 12.161.66.6 (talk) 22:06, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect. Parkwells (talk) 00:35, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There's no such thing as "the black gene" you racist. And "genetically be more black since the black gene is the dominant gene" indicates that you have no idea what "genetically" means and the difference between genotype and phenotype. -- Jibal (talk) 00:03, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't the case. Melanin, which determines skin color, is determined by four to six genes which operate under incomplete dominance. See the article Human skin color.24.124.64.42 (talk) 08:00, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just reread the article by Henry Louis Gates Jr., "White Like Me." According to this source, Broyard was predominantly of black ancestry - Gates consulted legal records in New Orleans (from which his family originated). If this is true, this article may be inaccurate. Aoibheannniamh (talk) 13:36, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There were disagreements as to how people were categorized. Broyard clearly was of mixed ancestry, but after the US takeover of the Louisiana Territory, the South's binary approach to racial categorization was adopted in Louisiana, so that people with any black ancestry were characterized as black, disregarding whether they also had white ancestry, as did Louisiana Creoles as a group.Parkwells (talk) 00:35, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"White Like Me" is an ideological polemic, not a reliable factual source. -- Jibal (talk) 00:15, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Broyard's race given too much importance

[edit]

What is Broyard most well known as? Broyard's race and his own view of it, though interesting to speculate on, are being given too much weight in this article. He wasn't widely known in his life as being part black, and he avoided the subject in his writing. He was known primarily as a writer and as being in the literary world, NOT for his ancestry. I don't know a lot about his work, but perhaps the focus of this article should be shifted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by The 2000 Man (talkcontribs) 01:36, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. This article is a racist hot mess, even going so far as to irrelevantly mention the skin tone of his wife. -- Jibal (talk) 00:06, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Anatole Broyard/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

It seems odd and sad that the names of only TWO of Broyard's THREE children are listed - especially when "family" is such an important part of Mr. Broyard's story. The New York Times obituary didn't even mention a first marriage, first wife (Aida Sanchez) and/or first child. Does anyone know the name of his first child - the daughter by Aida Sanchez? I'm new to Wikipedia and don't know how to research this. Thank you. --Mark229 (talk) 22:27, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 22:27, 5 February 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 07:42, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Deeply racist article

[edit]

"Broyard first married Aida Sanchez, a light-skinned, multi-racial Puerto Rican woman"

So what?

Broyard wanted to be seen as a writer and a person, not a black writer and a black person, and yet most of this article is about race -- how offensive and disgusting. -- Jibal (talk) 23:58, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the "light-skinned, multi-racial" bit as it is not in the citation given (as far as I can tell). Doctormatt (talk) 02:42, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Anatole Broyard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:46, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Anatole Broyard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anatole Broyard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:48, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:38, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]