This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Analytica (software) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 April 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

References added

Untitled

The original article contained an external link at the bottom to a long list of publications. I had organized it in that fashion for clarity, but this seems to have created a question about notability among Wikipedia editors, and a tag to be added saying that the article needed references or sources for verification. I've recently moved some of those references into the article itself, so that they are no longer on a separate external page. I hope this helps to address these two concerns.

A tag indicating that the article may need to be Wikified to meet quality guidelines was also added. I went through those guidelines and spotted one issue -- the capitalization of the second & third word in section headings. I've made those section headings lower case. As far as I could tell when reading through those extensive guidelines, the article seems to otherwise comply with the style guidelines. If there is a deviation I'm not spotting, please point it out.

I am unsure what I am supposed to do to have these concerns re-reviewed, so that the "consideration for deletion" and the "This article has multiple issues" header is removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ldc (talk • contribs) 19:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Product placement

This seems to be less informative than just advertising. --62.141.169.250 (talk) 12:17, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Remove tag?

The article seems to me to be informative and correct, and to discuss a significant modeling system. I believe that the off-putting warning tags should be removed. What's the fuss about? Are negative commentators being too stuffy? I note that there are Wikipedia articles on C, Pascal, and Vensim among others, as well as a long article on System Dynamics. All could be regarded as advertisements in some sense. This article has numerous references to published work based on use of Analytica, demonstrating its notability. That it was developed at a major university is another indication of prima facia notability. January 12, 2011.Pkensildavis (talk) 00:27, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 17 external links on Analytica (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:57, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Analytica (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:51, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]