Talk:Anadia, Portugal

Portugal Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was discussion moved. See below. --BDD (talk) 17:39, 2 April 2013 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Anadia Municipality, Portugal → Anadia, Portugal – The clarification "Municipality" is unnecessary. Vivaelcelta {talk · contributions} 02:26, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Portuguese geography § Naming convention discussing RE:Municipalities

Widen discussion to whole category: this article is a part of the Category:Municipalities of Portugal, containing 251 articles, of which approx. 191 are in the form "Foo Municipality" or "Foo Municipality, Portugal". It looks as if this suggestion - which FAIK may well be a very good one, but I don't know the background - might need wider consideration across the whole class of articles, rather than picking them off individually.Jsmith1000 (talk) 19:04, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will move the other articles when I have time. --Vivaelcelta {talk · contributions} 02:05, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This subject is specified in the WP:WikiProject Portuguese geography page. I agree completely, the city-municipality dichotomy has got to be eliminated and both series of articles merged. The problem that exists is that, in many cases, there is a article about city X, and an almost similar article about municipality X. I refer you to Sintra Municipality and Sintra, Portugal. Most, if not all the municipality articles, under the Category:Municipalities of Portugal were actually created by a known and discredited sock-puppeteer (User:Tobias Conradi), without consensus, ages ago (or in this case 2009). Content was then ported to the "Municipality" article and a distinction established that the "true name" functioned as a "city" article, while the "Municipality" article took on all the other municipal-wide functions. The reality is that treating those articles differently perpetuated a misconception that Portugal consists of cites, towns and villages with their own mayors or reaves, when in reality it is structured on extra-territorial regions of municipalities and parishes with their own executives and assemblies. The notion of political power of "cities" does not exist, since this power is invested in the municipalities and parishes. Geographically, cities, towns and villages can extend over the territorial jurisdiction of multiple municipalities and parishes (those entities responsible for governing their constituents). As a direct contributor to these types of articles, the best form of resolving all the Portuguese administrative division articles, is integrating the "municipality"-titled articles and merging them under their proper/simple namespaces. I support these types of name changes. Also, I suggest, even as there are few people working on content-development on the political geography of Portugal, this discussion should be duplicated at WP:WikiProject Portuguese geography. I will copy it there. ^{ruben jc}ZEORYMER (talk) 09:30, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anadia, Portugal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006143612/http://dev.igeo.pt/atlas/Cap2/Cap2d_2.html to http://dev.igeo.pt/atlas/Cap2/Cap2d_2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:04, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]