Talk:Anadarko, Oklahoma

Oklahoma Mid‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Indigenous peoples of North America

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Home of the Anadarko Warriors 7th and 8th grade middle undeafted —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.58.213.19 (talk) 00:46, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anadarko Daily News Merger proposal

Myself and another user believe that Anadarko Daily News Doesn't warrant its own page and as such should be merged here.--Steam Iron 18:19, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge. No reason a longstanding daily newspaper can't have its own stub. -Uyvsdi (talk) 00:51, 29 April 2010 (UTC)Uyvsdi[reply]

Support merge. I think it would be best placed into a subsection paragraph under a media section which would also incorporate other media from Anadarko (i.e. 103.5 FM). If more history and details about the paper can be uncovered in the future, then it would warrant its own stub article. Seeing as how its only a few sentences, I support the merge. Kiddo27 (talk) 23:55, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge. Anadarko Daily News is not a daily currently, but a small community newspaper. I think the article should be merged from the time being and if enough information is ever found to make it into its own article, a separate article can be created.Okiebradshaw (talk) 18:36, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I could go either way on this one. Since this is a longstanding newspaper in a county seat I believe there is notability there, even if it is currently a weekly paper. Merging it into the Anadarko article until it is "large enough" to have its own article would be acceptable, but who is to say what is or isn't "large enough". Interestingly, there is a proposal on WP:NNEWSPAPER that would be helpful in this case, but it is still just a proposal.Narthring (talk • contribs) 19:23, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see no point in adding anything more than a link within this page. People looking for information on the town are not looking for information on the newspaper.Moonbuy (talk) 17:35, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I would argue that under the Guidelines for U.S. cities, there should be a Media section for Anadarko, Oklahoma and that the information in the Anadarko Daily News article would fit perfectly. In response to the question of what is considered "large enough" I would say that stubs are generally articles that need to be improved and that in this case, I don't think the resources exist to do so. Okiebradshaw (talk) 19:32, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Anadarko, Oklahoma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:34, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]