Jump to content

Talk:Amy Pearson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Label

[edit]

Does anyone know what division of Sony BMG she's on? Sony BMG is not a label. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 18:48, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Amy Pearson/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
Start class:
  • Green tickY A reasonably complete infobox
  • Green tickY A lead section giving an overview of the person
  • Green tickY A discography listing
  • Green tickY Categorisation by, at least two of, music style, location and year

C class:

  • Green tickY All the start class criteria
  • Green tickY A reasonably complete infobox, including suitable photo where available
  • Green tickY At least one other section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
  • Green tickY A discography listing containing all major studio releases
  • Red XN Independent in-line references supporting major/controversial claims (e.g. chart positions / certifications in a newspaper are not reliable: find ARIA data)

B class:

  • Green tickY All the C class criteria
  • Green tickY A completed infobox, including suitable photo where available
  • Red XN No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources.
  • Red XN No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS
Reliable references needed for chart and other claims (a newspaper reference doesn't carry credibility in these areas: use ARIA data), more references needed for life details too, some re-writing of existing Prose for ease of read needed to get to C class.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 22:21, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 22:21, 26 August 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 07:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amy Pearson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:21, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amy Pearson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:13, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Amy Pearson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:25, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]